- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,231
- Reaction score
- 274,005
The investigators that paragraph as it stands refers to are the original investigators though, not Sides, Gilly, and Bivins.
But, assuming for the sake of argument that the affidavit has been poorly crafted and it does in fact refer to Sides, Gilly, and Bivins, and given that we know from the original incident did NOT involve threats to HD (as clearly evidenced by the 911 recordings), then you would have to agree that Sides, Gilly, and Bivins were confused about the original event and that SA was also confused. Or more likely he didn't recall the exact words and events from a year ago other than that him and BD had a big fight, and agreed with Sides, Gilly, and Bivins on the assumption that they knew what they were talking about (which apparently they didn't).
When deciding if these threats were true or not, and just exactly who they were made against, then you need to look at what was said in the original 911 tapes and any police report that might have been made at the time, along with any statements SA and BD made at the time, not what was said at a meeting a year later.
What about the text messages? That is where Billie said the threats were being made. How do you know what was said in those texts?