Yes I am quoting myself, but it is the easiest way to clarify.
When I read the article and snipped it, I assumed that the perp's last name was Wood. It is not. The perp is Jacob West.
So, I went back to the article, it lists the perp as West but then has the line about Wood's record.
Is this shoddy reporting or an irresponsible writer/editor???
Reporters want to be the first to break the information, and in that, they seem to lose most of their credibility.
My apologies. I don't know who the heck Wood is. I don't know if the reporter meant West. At this point, they may have researched some other's records.
Sorry for the confusion.
The article has not been amended yet if you would like to read it for yourself.