- Joined
- Jan 31, 2019
- Messages
- 5,645
- Reaction score
- 49,220
I haven't seen any update on the search efforts. I sure wish these reporters would do facebook lives, or someone would hold a press conference or something.
They've already been there and done that though?So maybe winter is a better time to search?
Completely agree!Someone took him.
I would like to hear why the PI, presumably still the one with an FBI background, also thinks a third party was involved. Otherwise, I still think it's more likely they just haven't found him yet near the crash site. MOOSomeone took him.
From the video, PI believes a 3rd party may be involved. I don't see a third party leaving all of Jason's valuables behind -- including the weed. MOO
I would like to hear why the PI, presumably still the one with an FBI background, also thinks a third party was involved. Otherwise, I still think it's more likely they just haven't found him yet near the crash site. MOO
I've been following Jason's case since day one and don't recall any MSM citing third party involvement. Also not familiar with PI story. Did I miss a link here?Has anyone found any MSM that says anything about a third party being involved? I took a quick stroll down Google Lane and didn't come up with anything. I'm wondering if the newscaster pulled that out of his.... hat.It's just odd that he'd say something like that, yet I can't find any other source saying the same thing. Maybe it's just me and I'm not using the best terms for Google to give me what I'm looking for.
It's in this story. It's not as detailed in the transcript, but in the video around 1:50 they clearly state "private investigators believe a third party may have been involved"I've been following Jason's case since day one and don't recall any MSM citing third party involvement. Also not familiar with PI story. Did I miss a link here?
Thanks, @Curious_in_NC.It's in this story. It's not as detailed in the transcript, but in the video around 1:50 they clearly state "private investigators believe a third party may have been involved"
Jason Landry: 86 points of interest circled in search for Texas State student
No, I don't think so, but the vid you linked to says 'a third party was involved'. Hence me trying to corroborate it anywhere but that video.I've been following Jason's case since day one and don't recall any MSM citing third party involvement. Also not familiar with PI story. Did I miss a link here?
Has anyone found any MSM that says anything about a third party being involved? I took a quick stroll down Google Lane and didn't come up with anything. I'm wondering if the newscaster pulled that out of his.... hat.It's just odd that he'd say something like that, yet I can't find any other source saying the same thing. Maybe it's just me and I'm not using the best terms for Google to give me what I'm looking for.
RSBMNo, I don't think so, but the vid you linked to says 'a third party was involved'. Hence me trying to corroborate it anywhere but that video.
RSBM
AFAIK that video is the only source. It may, or may not, have been information relayed from Kent Landry to the newscaster. It wouldn't be the first time information was embellished with regard to this case by MSM, if you remember the misleading "backpack filled with narcotics" report. To be fair, that was a different local news station than KXAN. But if the CCSO put a lot of stock in the PI's suggestions, they might not be doing the renewed search which was the main focus of the KXAN video and story.
I don’t have the ability to watch/listen to video at the moment. Is there any kind of synopsis of the interview or the credentials of the PI available?It's in this story. It's not as detailed in the transcript, but in the video around 1:50 they clearly state "private investigators believe a third party may have been involved"
Jason Landry: 86 points of interest circled in search for Texas State student