gypsyblue
this is not what Haleigh would have wanted
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2009
- Messages
- 2,729
- Reaction score
- 34
But due to the phone records the exact time of the phone calls should be clear.
time not context...imo
But due to the phone records the exact time of the phone calls should be clear.
It's clear to me police don't believe her story that she was just asked to dispose of a container. So if police don't believe that story what makes you think the container actually exists?
But due to the phone records the exact time of the phone calls should be clear.
Somewhere back in this thread or the one previous... MN allegedly said to the activist guy by the name of Q that the step dad had asked her (MN) to get rid of a container.
That is where the container came into play. Now I'm guessing it's speculation that MN carried JF out in some kind of container and that is why MN was not seen leaving specifically with JF.
I think the bigger question is how was Jonathan removed with witnesses who saw monas truck there and witnesses who gave sd an alibi yet didnt see Jonathan being removed....jmoIt's clear to me police don't believe her story that she was just asked to dispose of a container. So if police don't believe that story what makes you think the container actually exists?
I think the bigger question is how was Jonathan removed with witnesses who saw monas truck there and witnesses who gave sd an alibi yet didnt see Jonathan being removed....jmo
They cleared JO in the very beginning... a year later was in the comfort of an attorney, defending himself...Whom did they publicly clear in Haleigh Cummings case to later redact?
no we dont ...thats my point...but it was suggested.We don't know what gave the step-father his presumed alibi.
no offense to AD but the context of the phone calls changed SEVERAL times...
I am just remembering the step dad telling/whispering to the mom "don't give all the details" during an interview. There is some things that aren't being said and probably for good reason. Details they only want coming out in court etc...
Here are some of my unresolved questions.
1. Has anyone seen where LE took anything other than the welding torch thing (do not know the name of it) and the broom? IE: the mountain of evidence - the can - the carpet - did they collect these items?
2. 3:15 hours is maybe enough time to do all that, but would the body remain hot to the touch for a period of time and not be able to be moved?
3. What time was she back over at mom house that night?
4. If she burned him - would the smell be transferred to her? If yes, she would need a shower too in the time line.
5. Why did the officer mention greed today - certainly 20 dollars would not qualify.
I just wonder how she did do this alone in this time frame?
Please don't shoot me for asking questions!!!!
i soooo agree about the media reports of... but they have changed coming from her within her interviews and from what LE later added there were threats... even though im thinkin that might have been at the request of LE...jmoHas it really? Or has it just been changed in MSM? I think we don't know what AD told LE regarding the phone calls and if her story to LE has changed or not. There have been alot of media errors here, so I'm leaning in that direction.
I am going to post this over on the thread about MN possibly being involved in other murders too, but here is a comparison of MN vs the sketch of the "man" that murdered the people in February 2008 in Illinois in the Lane Bryant store. I also found evidence that MN was in Tazwell County Illinois with some sort of Code 3-112 violation from July 12, 2003. From what I can determine, Code 3-112 is some sort of "Failure to transfer license" violation when a vehicle is sold. This Mona Y. Nelson on the other thumbnail I am attaching has the same birthday (3/4/66) and had a Texas drivers license at the time of the charge in Illinois, and interestingly enough, was documented on this Illinois document as being a "Male".
These pictures are uncanny, and I have seen other pictures of MN where her lips look larger than her recent arrest picture, thereby implying an significant resemblance to these sketches, IMO.
It is difficult to deny the resemblance, IMO, and I am sure LE will be flooded with calls, since they announced a possible link between MN and other missing children (or crimes?).
I am just remembering the step dad telling/whispering to the mom "don't give all the details" during an interview. There is some things that aren't being said and probably for good reason. Details they only want coming out in court etc...
Did they already suspect MN at this point? If they did, it would make sense for the SD to say that to AD.
Anything is possible with regards to Mona doing something after the death.
I have no clue if there ever was a presser where LE has lied or twisted the truth in a presser. I am only familiar with "sources close to the investigation" that twist things.![]()
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.