#BREAKING: Defense moves for a mistrial saying that the district attorney did not turn over key evidence related to the vandalism report that happened in the days following the murder. He says this information is consequential to this murder.
Sadly, I was expecting something like this#BREAKING: Defense moves for a mistrial saying that the district attorney did not turn over key evidence related to the vandalism report that happened in the days following the murder. He says this information is consequential to this murder.
This is probably what they hung their hopes on! I'm sure KA could have told D about itSadly, I was expecting something like this
Glad the judge denied it
KA probably kicked the motorcycle into the jeep to dent it so it wouldn't match the video Jeep. moo@alcaprari23
Defense: "It is assuredly material. It is clear the police department never turned it over to the DA, to the defense..."Judge has heard enough. Denies motion for mistrial.
Ha! I always thought she was the one who pushed over the motorcycle into her Jeep!@alcaprari23
Defense asking Spitler why criminal mischief and vandalism wasn't further investigated. Spitler says he doesn't know who even investigated the vandalism at the house. Says he believes Armstrong was the one to pushed over the motorcycle.
I don't think it was a question of not having a warrant. Detective Spitler searched CS laptop (used by KA) and returned it to him as a courtesy. This computer was not forensically tested.At that point the detective knew KA was basically running CS's business and had all his passwords (from what CS had previously told him). Would that not have been enough to convince a judge to sign a warrant for a laptop that KA had access to and might contain evidence?
Throw the case for dollar bills in the flower bed and tipped over motorbike. We saw KA's loose money on the table -- didn't take much effort to drop a few pesos out her kitchen window."Judge has heard enough. Denies motion for mistrial"
LOL