- Joined
- Jul 29, 2018
- Messages
- 11,152
- Reaction score
- 73,912
I don't think the biking community is that homogenous in Austin. Gravel racers are such a tiny subset of the many bikers (or most) who never compete in any way except against their own personal goals.
I think there could be recreational bikers on the jury who could be fair and unbiased. JMO, though.
I'm curious about everyone's thoughts are on picking jurors for this case. What biases will both sides be seeking to eliminate?
If i openly say what i think, i shall cross some inevitable line, so let me talk less about the jurors and more, the public. Unlike the case of Suzanne Morphew, where a petite, pretty, churchgoing housewife looked so charismatic to both women and men, in the case of Mo Wilson’s murder, opinions about the three involved persons might differ.
First, the three participants are younger, and one can see how this generational difference skews the general opinion of the situation. On the internet, it is mostly their age group, and younger people who are judgmental.
There will be undoubtedly some prejudice-projection as most have seen both sides of cheating factor. Likewise, how do we reconcile the image of a frail girl living with an alcoholic parent, who evokes a lot of sympathy, with someone who can later, in anger, mindlessly kill another human being, and escape abroad to enjoy life?
I feel one of the biggest issues in this case, jury-wise, would be to avoid projections. Just to reiterate:
- the only victim is Mo, who paid the highest price. We don't know how Mo saw the whole situation, but truth is, Kaitlin is given the chance of a fair trial. Mo didn't get it. Judging by the time, KA gave her no courtesy to be asked what she thought of CS (and it is possible that her answer would be very surprising to KA). No, Mo was just executed.
- I listened to CS, his talk about own eating habits, the tone of his voice. I am prepared to cut him some slack, but not sure that the community feels the same. Just to remind, KA was no Pygmalion in that relationship. By the time they met, CS was 31-32, educated, gifted man, and a champion. He was a self-made man; it is important as KA did not dedicate her whole life to that guy and then someone else took him away.
Last but not least. I understand how Mo's orphaned family wants privacy. For the sake of fairness, every photo of "oh, so gorgeous" Kaitlin should be balanced by a photo of Mo. Childhood, adolescent, student.
I intentionally veer off the issue of the jurors, so sorry, it is halfway answer to your question. I want fairness for Mo.