- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,227
- Reaction score
- 273,952
Hasn't it been shared with MSM?
Not all of it.
Hasn't it been shared with MSM?
Hasn't it been shared with MSM?
So since you consider him a worthless liar, it is 'derailing the disvcussion' for me to ask if he might be telling the truth about the kick? Derailing the discussion, as in taking away from where the majority want it to go?
Then the person with the cell phone should offer up that part of the video. LE said they were trying to get a hold of it and couidn't. If the cell video shows that she didn't kick him, wouldnt the cell owner turn it over to CNN or someone?
It wasn't really the infraction that resulted in her death. It was partially her rude, hostile attitude which amped up the situation, needlessly. The cop had an ego and she had an attitude and it got ugly, fast.
IF you are taking a cell video of a woman arguing with a cop, are you going to stop when they start scuffling with each other?There seems to be a big chunk missing, right when the tussle between them happens.
there are video cams in every square foot of that jail.
link:
http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-84053091/
The trooper later wrote in an affidavit that Bland kicked him, leading to his use of force in which he took her to the ground.
==================================================================
How is asking a question, based on the facts of THIS CASE, considered derailing the discussion? :waitasec:
Just curious...what if it was your family member that you felt certain would never kill herself despite what LE was saying? What would you do?
First, I never said he was worthless -- I said that his testimony is worthless.
As for your first question, I don't see how it helps to ask a bunch of questions that, in all honesty, can only be answered as "who knows?"
As for your second question -- I have no idea what you're talking about regarding 'where the majority want it to go'. Saying that I think most people do not find the officer credible does in no way suggest that there is some direction in which most people want the discussion to go. You're making a big assumption, and also characterizing many people in suggesting that they all have some preconceived direction about anything here. It's not fair to make assumptions about how others think.
RBM
And sheriffs don't lie?
Correct me if I'm wrong in understanding the bolded. It is because she was rude and hostile, she is dead???
I didn't ask a 'bunch' of questions. I asked ONE, which was about the officers claim that she kicked him. You said that by asking that I was 'derailing the discussion.'
Troopers are human. Humans sometimes (many times) lie. To keep their jobs.
Hmm.. Why in hell didn't he keep himself and her in his vehicle's video cam's scope? Why did he move her out of the view?
Isn't having the video cam for evidence? Hah!
With respect, I was referring to a number of posts, not just the one in question. And I'm not going to waste any more time in this off-topic discussion, as it does derail the discussion, just as hypothetical questions do.
Considering that the officer lied several times when he was talking to his department/precinct, I hardly consider the officer's account on the events that happened off-camera to be 'facts'. We have no idea what happened when, or whether he was kicked at all. We only have his self-serving testimony at this point, and I consider it worthless, and I suspect most of the posters in this thread do as well.
They are human and so I would say yes they do. I don't have facts that tell me they are lying in this instance. Until I have proof otherwise, I have no reason not to believe an article in paper, about timeline and video's that the camera's are motion activated.RBM
And sheriffs don't lie?
Asking if the officer was telling the truth is not a hypothetical question, nor is it off topic. JMO
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.