TX - Terri 'Missy' Bevers, 45, killed in church/suspect in SWAT gear, Midlothian, 18 Apr 2016 #45

[Mistree]

“Poor man’s G35”!

LA Auto Show: 2008 Nissan Altima Coupe - the poor man's G35

 

[Itsapuzzle]

Spontaneous random .... I don’t think this person is wearing a V-neck top like the one in the church footage.

 

[TobyWong*]

Dec 2017
'I'm done': Husband of personal trainer slaughtered by masked man more than a year ago says he's ending his hunt for her killer for the sake of their kids

'The children are not terribly fond of apprehending this person. They don't want to revisit those emotions-they have told me this,' he wrote in part.
Husband says he is done searching for wife's killer | Daily Mail Online

April 2018
An extraordinary dollar amount, certainly. But for BB, the gesture by his daughter in itself was a surprise that forced him to fight back the tears.

"It went from one thousand to ten thousand in a matter of seconds and to be quite honest, I didn't know she had personally endowed the funds [toward Missy's investigation],"

She plans to continue showing livestock to raise money to find answers surrounding around her mother's unsolved murder that occurred at Creekside Church in Midlothian on April 18, 2016.

$15,000 and 'speechless': Allison Bevers endows pig sale to fund Missy Bevers investigation

I get a very different impression of what the children may want. Maybe that changed over time, maybe not. However, it seems this daughter wants answers. She deserves answers, and I hope she finds them.

Ty I haven't been as invested in this case to where I know everything (so many cases every single day). Sheds light on area I hadn't thought alot about but have been more so recently. I just want justice and closure for the families involved.

 

[Itsapuzzle]

Also on the V-neck topic, it looks like there's no hair there at all, as far as I can see .... a few of the POI's or those who have been of interest in this case have quite a lot of hair there and the footage/photos at 0.51 to 0.53 seem to indicate bare white skin .... MOO of course.

 

[No it's not]

It may not be the SWFA sign causing it. It might be an imperfection in the pavement that is reflected up onto the car. To me, it isn’t as important to know the source of the bumper feature. It’s more important to determine whether something is there or is being projected.

For me the light only gets marginally better from 7:31 on. Not so much that I can buy a vinyl decal suddenly becoming visible when it used to be invisible. In these pictures notice how the muffler becomes a little more visible. But there was never a point where it was INvisible; you could always tell it was there:

View attachment 291287

One thing that I guess could be possible is that a bumper sticker might have once been there and there might still be old adhesive residue there. This would not help us find the car though because it would not be visible in the light of day.

Quick question, what do you think, is it remotely possible, that a partial tag ID of the SWFA vehicle came back as belonging to a light InfinityG35 ? Perp "borrowed" or permanently removed/ stole tag from the Infinity? Car never left a surveilled exit gate of an apartment complex for example.

Agree with you, hard to believe, that the FBI could not id the exact vehicle model.

Let's just assume Missy was targeted and the SWFA driver was a red herring. What a spoof that would be to steal or remove a tag from a similar vehicle and casing the SWFA building with the intention to be seen as someone with rather long legs etc. and then we see that short costumed up Rumpelstiltskin protected to the ying yang and playing burglary in the church..

ALL IMO

-Nin

 

[No it's not]

Good work! Could it be a 2007?? Check out this 2007 that I found from an auction in TX with a similar shaped sticker or feature on the bumper. Not sure if it is the same size sticker/feature, if other features fit, etc. but worth exploring.

2007 NISSAN ALTIMA 2.5/2.5S, 1N4AL21EX7C231732 photos - Poctra.com

Interesting, but then LE said it's a 2010-2012 model.

-Nin

 

[SteveS]

IMO LE has no downside in airing imprecision over which make/model of car was there.

They have created a public thought of an Altima at SWFA that night, and that's enough. Heck, the SWFA car may not have been related to MB's death at all, in which case who cares what it is?

But on warrants (where we find the less precise wording), it's to their benefit to cite evidence in a way that casts the widest net possible, permitting greater opportunity for search warrants as needed. If you only ever mention Altima, you can't later use that car video to help justify a search of a person with an Infiniti. Or other unspecified "similar car." It was wise imo to nudge that door back open a bit, and leave it ajar.

 

[Gumshoe Stories]

Quick question, what do you think, is it remotely possible, that a partial tag ID of the SWFA vehicle came back as belonging to a light InfinityG35 ? Perp "borrowed" or permanently removed/ stole tag from the Infinity? Car never left a surveilled exit gate of an apartment complex for example.

Agree with you, hard to believe, that the FBI could not id the exact vehicle model.

Let's just assume Missy was targeted and the SWFA driver was a red herring. What a spoof that would be to steal or remove a tag from a similar vehicle and casing the SWFA building with the intention to be seen as someone with rather long legs etc. and then we see that short costumed up Rumpelstiltskin protected to the ying yang and playing burglary in the church..

ALL IMO

-Nin

Yes I think it’s possible that maybe they switched tags with an Infiniti. That could work.

But all that about SWFA being a red herring seems too complicated. Occam’s Razor, simple solution is usually best.

 

[Sillybilly]

I am not nitpicking the sticker issue. I just think it is crucially important to locate that driver/owner of the vehicle in order to include or exclude a connection to the MB case, as the driver is clearly wearing a face covering/balaclava (below eyes) IMO.

<rsbm>

This is the image of SP that WS member misdirect posted back in Thread #30, Post #802

IMO, what appears to be a white mask on SP looks to be the same as that worn by the individual in the vehicle.

In the above linked post, WSer misdirect references their prior posts about how they arrived at this image. I'm sorry I don't have time to go back further, but just wanted to get this one brought forward.

 

[Sillybilly]

To save everybody else having to rummage, I found the prior posts that misdirect referenced:

Thread #23, Post #941
Thread #25, Post 715

 

[Inthedetails]

<rsbm>

This is the image of SP that WS member misdirect posted back in Thread #30, Post #802

IMO, what appears to be a white mask on SP looks to be the same as that worn by the individual in the vehicle.

That picture gives me chills.

I know many people have analyzed the car at the SWFA and think it's a thief casing the store. Could be! But I think it's SP (and perhaps a partner) who stopped by that parking lot to "regroup" and go over the plans, etc. before heading to the church.

When the car turns off the lights upon entering the lot, I think it was to be less noticeable. When the car then encounters vehicles by the loading dock and turns on the headlights, there is speculation I've seen that the person is then trying to look "normal," not like a sneaky thief.

As someone who is not a thief, I think the headlights were turned on out of habit to see better, to see what the other cars were, etc. I see the headlights as the opposite of someone being stealth, but someone who doesn't have criminal habits.

Same with sitting under the lamplight in the parking lot. I would park there if I had to read something, look at a map, list of items, check messages, etc. I'd rather sit under the light than turn on the dome light. Parking under the lamplight doesn't seem like something an experienced criminal would do.

When the driver turns on the blinker out of habit when exiting the lot when a blinker wasn't necessary, that seems, imo, more likely to be a woman and likely not a criminally-minded one. speculation.

I do think the person at the store could very well be SP, but I don't think it's a perp spending time in the rain looking for a place to burglar. Speculation, of course.

Brainstorming.

jmo

 

[Deleted member 718]

I'd like to know how often a car pulled into SWFA's parking lot at night? A few times a week or rarely?

 

[Razz]

Who or why would someone wear a WHITE balaclava? Sorry, it just seems odd to me. I'd think black would be the color of choice to go with the dark outfit. And boy does that pic look like a woman. Do men wear white balaclavas? Seems it would be more appropriate for a woman who goes skiing.

 

[Deleted member 102539]

Same with sitting under the lamplight in the parking lot. I would park there if I had to read something, look at a map, list of items, check messages, etc. I'd rather sit under the light than turn on the dome light. Parking under the lamplight doesn't seem like something an experienced criminal would do.

^^ This would make sense! IMO What if the driver communicated in some form with his accomplice/with the killer?

 

[Deleted member 102539]

Who or why would someone wear a WHITE balaclava? Sorry, it just seems odd to me. I'd think black would be the color of choice to go with the dark outfit. And boy does that pic look like a woman. Do men wear white balaclavas? Seems it would be more appropriate for a woman who goes skiing.

All deliberate misleading by the smart killer perhaps?

 

[No it's not]

<rsbm>

This is the image of SP that WS member misdirect posted back in Thread #30, Post #802

IMO, what appears to be a white mask on SP looks to be the same as that worn by the individual in the vehicle.

In the above linked post, WSer misdirect references their prior posts about how they arrived at this image. I'm sorry I don't have time to go back further, but just wanted to get this one brought forward.

Thank you SB.

I have seen this image before. IMO the individual is wearing a full balaclava including nose cover as seen here in this frame. You can clearly see the eye openings (What looks like a mouth is most likely just a reflection, we cannot see the full face of the SP)

(Enlarged, Toning, Filter)

Click to enlarge

It is very interesting IMO, that the individual is wearing

1. A light/balaclava
2. An additional face covering/ or helmet with chin/ jaw protection
3. Safety glasses or real glasses plus helmet visor (see image below)

Here is a frame I have been working on over the weekend. I am checking out some other frames with different angles as well.

In general the toning is adjusted after enlarging the image. I focused mainly on the head area, while running several programs, that are able to recognized noise and artifacts. Nothing is added, nothing is omitted.

Here is the image, they are either wearing real glasses plus visor or safety kind of glasses plus visor:


Click to enlarge

ALL IMO

-Nin

 

[Tiff23fr]

IMO LE has no downside in airing imprecision over which make/model of car was there.

They have created a public thought of an Altima at SWFA that night, and that's enough. Heck, the SWFA car may not have been related to MB's death at all, in which case who cares what it is?

But on warrants (where we find the less precise wording), it's to their benefit to cite evidence in a way that casts the widest net possible, permitting greater opportunity for search warrants as needed. If you only ever mention Altima, you can't later use that car video to help justify a search of a person with an Infiniti. Or other unspecified "similar car." It was wise imo to nudge that door back open a bit, and leave it ajar.

I was also thinking, if they want the average person to keep an eye out for say an Altima with a sticker, the average person is not going to be asking him/herself what year the vehicle is if they noticed such a vehicle in a grocery store parking lot or on the highway somewhere.

 

[DeDee]

Thank you SB.

I have seen this image before. IMO the individual is wearing a full balaclava including nose cover as seen here in this frame. You can clearly see the eye openings (What looks like a mouth is most likely just a reflection, we cannot see the full face of the SP)

(Enlarged, Toning, Filter)
View attachment 291395
Click to enlarge

It is very interesting IMO, that the individual is wearing

1. A light/balaclava
2. An additional face covering/ or helmet with chin/ jaw protection
3. Safety glasses or real glasses plus helmet visor (see image below)

Here is a frame I have been working on over the weekend. I am checking out some other frames with different angles as well.

In general the toning is adjusted after enlarging the image. I focused mainly on the head area, while running several programs, that are able to recognized noise and artifacts. Nothing is added, nothing is omitted.

Here is the image, they are either wearing real glasses plus visor or safety kind of glasses plus visor:

View attachment 291394
Click to enlarge

ALL IMO

-Nin

Excellent work, NIN. This is the first time I've been able to recognize the outline of eyeglass frames! Well done.

 

[zee007]

Thank you SB.

I have seen this image before. IMO the individual is wearing a full balaclava including nose cover as seen here in this frame. You can clearly see the eye openings (What looks like a mouth is most likely just a reflection, we cannot see the full face of the SP)

(Enlarged, Toning, Filter)
View attachment 291395
Click to enlarge

It is very interesting IMO, that the individual is wearing

1. A light/balaclava
2. An additional face covering/ or helmet with chin/ jaw protection
3. Safety glasses or real glasses plus helmet visor (see image below)

Here is a frame I have been working on over the weekend. I am checking out some other frames with different angles as well.

In general the toning is adjusted after enlarging the image. I focused mainly on the head area, while running several programs, that are able to recognized noise and artifacts. Nothing is added, nothing is omitted.

Here is the image, they are either wearing real glasses plus visor or safety kind of glasses plus visor:

View attachment 291394
Click to enlarge

ALL IMO

-Nin

Seems quite extreme for the SP to cover themselves to this extent if their intent was purely burglary. Unless they were expecting a confrontation which then may explain the layers of protection they are wearing. There are a few frames where you can see a silhouette of the the SP's face from the side when they open the Dutch doors. Could probably deduce some facial features such as the shape of their nose etc.

The trousers are also wider compared to the SP's leg and it looks like they may be wearing some kind of protection underneath (shin guards perhaps?). The shoes could be another clue, it may have a unique shape and/or markings which may help identify them.

Considering this and your post, it looks like the SP is well equipped and protected. I imagine driving with even some of this gear on would be very difficult and one would have to push their seat as far back as possible (as we see in the SWFA CCTV footage).

 

[Gumshoe Stories]

When the car turns off the lights upon entering the lot, I think it was to be less noticeable. When the car then encounters vehicles by the loading dock and turns on the headlights, there is speculation I've seen that the person is then trying to look "normal," not like a sneaky thief.

As someone who is not a thief, I think the headlights were turned on out of habit to see better, to see what the other cars were, etc. I see the headlights as the opposite of someone being stealth, but someone who doesn't have criminal habits.

Same with sitting under the lamplight in the parking lot. I would park there if I had to read something, look at a map, list of items, check messages, etc. I'd rather sit under the light than turn on the dome light. Parking under the lamplight doesn't seem like something an experienced criminal would do.

Snipped for focus, and BBM. Regarding turning off the lights, it’s been suggested that cutting the lights would make it easier for the driver to see into the interior of the building.

Then regarding the choice to park under the lamp post, I read a comment on Stephanie Harlowe’s YouTube podcast about the case; the comment suggested that parking under a lamp post is EXACTLY what a criminal might do. What he said was, “I knew a [censored] who used to boost from stores who told me that thing about parking directly under the light being the best spot to avoid cameras.” I thought that was kind of interesting.