- Joined
- Jul 8, 2008
- Messages
- 18,286
- Reaction score
- 51,418
me too!
What did you and Sparky hear?
me too!
What did you and Sparky hear?
This is not what I heard on NG, but I admit I tuned out Nancy's misguided speculation.
The following is from the narration of a male reporter included in her program:
"Police confirm Bevers' husband Brandon knew about her infidelity in the relationship and he told police about it. Police extracted deleted information from Missy Bevers' phone -- information that confirmed an affair."
That's what I heard.
Maybe escalation?
I wasn't basing my assumption about both of them having affairs on rumor- but rather my interpretation of the the search warrant.Incorrect. The "(s)" structure is known as an "optional plural." It denotes "one or more."
And no one ever said she had a physically intimate relationship. LE did say she had intimate communications with someone, and that is a "relationship", though not necessarily a physical one. And it is the only external relationship that has been communicated to us.
TxMommy back on page 33 of Thread 19 from two weeks ago basically said the same thing I took issue with today. Quote:
"Can I ask why so many posters seem to have such a hard time with the notion of BB having an affair but have pretty much accepted that MB was having multiple affairs?
Is there something in the search warrant that specifies which one of them was having affairs and which one wasn't?
Because it is my understanding that BOTH of them engaged in extracurricular activities, so-to-speak."
With no evidence whatsoever of BB having an external relationship, it is just rumor. That is something we are not supposed to bring here.
This is not what I heard on NG, but I admit I tuned out Nancy's misguided speculation.
The following is from the narration of a male reporter included in her program:
"Police confirm Bevers' husband Brandon knew about her infidelity in the relationship and he told police about it. Police extracted deleted information from Missy Bevers' phone -- information that confirmed an affair."
I generally disagreed with your entire post. You appear to only consider that the 'external relationship(s) could only pertain to MB and not be pertaining to both partners in the marriage. LE didn't differentiate that it was more than one for MB or that each of the married pair had engaged in external relationship(s). All concentration has been put upon MB and no consideration has been given that BB had also had a relationship outside of the marriage. Outside of the SW, only BB and his mother have referred to MB's "flirty" SM communication to another man.I don't know what you're disagreeing with, because your post did not address a single thing I actually said.
What is the Cowboy Church?
This is not what I heard on NG, but I admit I tuned out Nancy's misguided speculation.
The following is from the narration of a male reporter included in her program:
"Police confirm Bevers' husband Brandon knew about her infidelity in the relationship and he told police about it. Police extracted deleted information from Missy Bevers' phone -- information that confirmed an affair."
Hey Folks,
Let's agree to disagree and move away from the affairs for the night. Everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Thanks!
Thanks Sparky!fftobed:
Mouth slobber from the ski mask or baklava. Maybe spit on Missy or sweat dripped.
One thing that bothers me is that LE has to have video of the killer leaving the church after Missy was murdered. They haven't shown us any of that video but it should pinpoint exactly what time the killer left the building. This is important because one of the students arrived early for the class and was sitting in the parking lot in her car. So why didn't she see someone exit the building? Why was the killer comfortable cutting it so close timewise to when other people would be arriving at the church? That was a big risk. He or she could've run into someone as they were coming to class, instead the killer seems to be in no hurry at all, waiting around in the church after Missy arrived but before attacking her.
I find this curious. SP is there 1st, MB is there 2nd and Camper 1 (C1) is there 3rd. MB never leaves and C1 presumably never leaves (waits in car for friends to go in, finds body and calls 911?) Someone from the scene called MT (BB bio mom) and it is rumored that someone called BB before LE to notify of MB "accident". I need to establish a verified timeline VS the unknowns bc IMO something is just off, I'm not sure what piece it is. Ok, we haven't heard any interviews or statements from any CG campers there that morning, haven't heard the 911 call and IIRC LE never stated the camera picked up C1 entering lot at 4:35. :thinking: :thinking:
IMO
I find this curious. SP is there 1st, MB is there 2nd and Camper 1 (C1) is there 3rd. MB never leaves and C1 presumably never leaves (waits in car for friends to go in, finds body and calls 911?) Someone from the scene called MT (BB bio mom) and it is rumored that someone called BB before LE to notify of MB "accident". I need to establish a verified timeline VS the unknowns bc IMO something is just off, I'm not sure what piece it is. Ok, we haven't heard any interviews or statements from any CG campers there that morning, haven't heard the 911 call and IIRC LE never stated the camera picked up C1 entering lot at 4:35. :thinking: :thinking:
IMO
bbm: Unless the perp already owned the outfit? I have thought about this being a LE person committing the crime. Maybe hired? I think if an ordinary person were to get an outfit like this together, they wouldn't bother with the "POLICE" lettering on front and back as long as they were still fully covered? It probably isn't a real LE person but it has crossed my mind due to the "official" police lettering. I think you can buy that, however. But again, why not just buy the plain black outfits like that? Unless it's more for the "fear factor" when your victim sees you?