TX - Terri 'Missy' Bevers,45, murdered in church/person in SWAT gear,18 Apr 2016 #25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Respectfully, Here is WS Member Galadriel Verbatim transcript of 4/18/16 presser w/ Chief Carl Smith and Captain John Spann. Video is also at the link. http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...eline-*NO-DISCUSSION*&p=12592838#post12592838

This is where I form my opinion.^^^
Suspect busted out the exterior metal kitchen door on middle of North side of building, that is where entry was. View attachment 96154View attachment 96155View attachment 96156

ETA, also didn't have to go from corner of building to opposite corner of building. Was in the SW Corner of building ( NW SW NE SE) from there all had to do to get back to the kitchen and out, was go back down main hallway (direction came from in the video where coming to open door and try pry other) then take a right on that North hallway and down mid way and out through kitchen door. Not a great distance. JMHO
Does anyone know where the door in the third picture is located?
Also, the sort of overhead shot of perp exiting door on police video- is that the kitchen door? Do we know that? TIA
 
Can someone help me out here......It is my opinion that LE ...meaning MPD and the various other agencies who quickly stepped in to offer their assistance, along with all their combined expertise, state-of-the-art equipment, priority access to lab results, etc., narrowed down the killer within 3 days as stated by a commentator on True Crime radio a few weeks back. By now they probably have mountains of information and are witholding most of it from the public which is understandable. I am curious as to why one of the VERY few pieces of information they put out there for the public was the height range....5'2". --5'7" , and please correct me if I am wrong, that the killer was a female and the skin color was light. My question is...why put out THOSE particular pieces of information out of the thousands of other pieces of information they have? Also, IMO, I think they jumped the gun by naming names on the SW and releasing it to the public so quickly. Then they had to back pedal and say that NONE of the persons listed were of any interest. (don' t recall the exact wording. ) They also pretty much said they had a good description of the killer and didn't need the public calling in anymore. My own words, too lazy to go back and look for everything so please correct me if I am wrong.

I have several theories as to what may have occurred. One is they believed based on numerous tips on the same person that they had a solid lead, which they later recanted and said was a waste of time. Another thought is they know who did it, have proof but are building the case so that there is no room for doubt. My third thought is they know who did it but are waiting for scientific testing, to be concluded before charging that individual. My fourth and final thought, well it sickens me, is they have no evidence. JMO


Sent from my iPhone
 
Can someone help me out here......It is my opinion that LE ...meaning MPD and the various other agencies who quickly stepped in to offer their assistance, along with all their combined expertise, state-of-the-art equipment, priority access to lab results, etc., narrowed down the killer within 3 days as stated by a commentator on True Crime radio a few weeks back. By now they probably have mountains of information and are witholding most of it from the public which is understandable. I am curious as to why one of the VERY few pieces of information they put out there for the public was the height range....5'2". --5'7" , and please correct me if I am wrong, that the killer was a female and the skin color was light. My question is...why put out THOSE particular pieces of information out of the thousands of other pieces of information they have? Also, IMO, I think they jumped the gun by naming names on the SW and releasing it to the public so quickly. Then they had to back pedal and say that NONE of the persons listed were of any interest. (don' t recall the exact wording. ) They also pretty much said they had a good description of the killer and didn't need the public calling in anymore. My own words, too lazy to go back and look for everything so please correct me if I am wrong.
Respectfully BBM & JMHO
1) re gender and race: This is incorrect. MPD has stated as of May 20 Press Conf, that they do not know the gender, nor the race, or weight. The reconstruction only helped find the Height. http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...eline-*NO-DISCUSSION*&p=12581000#post12581000

We've also learned some additional information regarding the physical description of the suspect. Forensic video reconstruction is complete and has given us a height range for the suspect from approximately 5'2" to 5'7"

Male Reporter:What more information did they glean from reviewing that forensic lead, specifically with that limp and walk?

Chief Kevin Johnson:Unfortunately, that's all the information that was gleaned from that. My understanding of that software and that reconstruction process is that it's helpful just to obtain measurements.

Male Reporter:No weight?

Chief Kevin Johnson:No, sir.

Male Reporter:What about gender?

Chief Kevin Johnson:No. We haven't yet established definitively the gender of the suspect. You know, they went to a lot of ––to great effort to conceal their identity, and so far, without definitive information on the gender, it could be male or female.

Male Reporter:What about race?

Chief Kevin Johnson:We ––you know, it appears ––just like you've seen in the video, it appears that they're lighter–skinned. Again, we can't definitively say what race they are. We don't believe them to be a dark–skinned person.


2) They were and are working a Murder investigation and in doing so is why they did the SW. They released them because they have to by Texas Law. They are not back peddling they are working through the case.

TITLE 1. CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
CHAPTER 18. SEARCH WARRANTS
Art. 18.01. SEARCH WARRANT.
(a) A "search warrant" is a written order, issued by a magistrate and directed to a peace officer, commanding him to search for any property or thing and to seize the same and bring it before such magistrate or commanding him to search for and photograph a child and to deliver to the magistrate any of the film exposed pursuant to the order.
(b) No search warrant shall issue for any purpose in this state unless sufficient facts are first presented to satisfy the issuing magistrate that probable cause does in fact exist for its issuance. A sworn affidavit setting forth substantial facts establishing probable cause shall be filed in every instance in which a search warrant is requested.Except as provided by Article 18.011, the affidavit is public information if executed, and the magistrate's clerk shall make a copy of the affidavit available for public inspection in the clerk's office during normal business hours.
MORE at link http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/CR/htm/CR.18.htm

3) The individuals were Persons of Interest is why they are listed on the SW. -- link is at first page of each thread and each SW explains why/and what the reason for ea SW in Probable Cause Affidavit

4) The individuals on the SW, are not POI or Suspects at this time, but they also have not been cleared. No one will be cleared until there is an arrest. May 20 Press Conf http://www.websleuths.com/forums/sh...eline-*NO-DISCUSSION*&p=12581000#post12581000

As would be done in any murder investigation where the suspect is not known, [the] initial focus was on people who were close to the victim, such as friends, family,and co–workers. These people are often referred to as "persons of interest." From "persons of interest" sometimes come suspects. At this point, none of the family, friends, or co–workers of Missy Bevers are considered suspects. Despite various theories circulating through social media, none of the people named in our affidavits are now suspects. Several family members seem to also be at the center of the public's focus.I just want to be clear that the Bevers family, including Mr. Bevers and his father, have been cooperative, forthcoming, and provided detailed alibis that have all been corroborated through independent sources. Until Missy's killer is caught, I will stop short of saying that any person is absolutely excluded, but to be clear, none of Missy's family are at the focus of this investigation
 
Does anyone know where the door in the third picture is located?
Also, the sort of overhead shot of perp exiting door on police video- is that the kitchen door? Do we know that? TIA

If your speaking of the ss I posted they are all of the same door. The outer/exterior metal door was damaged by Suspect (allegedly) and there is a little room inside that then a door that goes directly into the Kitchen.

And General Public, as far as I know do not know where that shot is from, but JMHO no it is not the kitchen door. ** I had to go back and look and correct my prior statement earlier in thread, the Kitchen doors do have windows** Unless the Suspect locked him/herself out of the kitchen, I don't know why Suspect would bust one of the 2 kitchen hallway doors. Anything is possible. We just don't have that time stamp info. Suspect came in from the exterior door and went from Kitchen into the hallway is how had access into the Church. JMHO
 
JMO. If I may opine.....I hope that not releasing the autopsy report and cause of death more detailed than "puncture wounds" is for a very good investigative reason. If a "puncture wound" is a gunshot wound, I find it hard to believe that campers did not smell it, whether or not they saw it. Also, that days later the dog was brought in. If a bullet was retrieved, I believe that ballistics tests have already come back with results. The only other thing I can think of is if she was bludgeoned, then strangled, then disfigured...but that can't be, because puncture wounds killed her. JUST MY OPINION
 
Can someone help me out here......It is my opinion that LE ...meaning MPD and the various other agencies who quickly stepped in to offer their assistance, along with all their combined expertise, state-of-the-art equipment, priority access to lab results, etc., narrowed down the killer within 3 days as stated by a commentator on True Crime radio a few weeks back. By now they probably have mountains of information and are witholding most of it from the public which is understandable. I am curious as to why one of the VERY few pieces of information they put out there for the public was the height range....5'2". --5'7" , and please correct me if I am wrong, that the killer was a female and the skin color was light. My question is...why put out THOSE particular pieces of information out of the thousands of other pieces of information they have? Also, IMO, I think they jumped the gun by naming names on the SW and releasing it to the public so quickly. Then they had to back pedal and say that NONE of the persons listed were of any interest. (don' t recall the exact wording. ) They also pretty much said they had a good description of the killer and didn't need the public calling in anymore. My own words, too lazy to go back and look for everything so please correct me if I am wrong.

Police have never confirmed gender of SP.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Police have never confirmed gender of SP.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

This is true. But they estimated the height at between 5'2 and 5'7 after further analysis, and have reportedly allowed BB to view otherwise unseen by the public, additional video. BB said that he is quite sure that the perp is a female. JMO ETA....He also said that he saw the perp "HOLSTER" what he thought was a hammer of some sort......we have not seen that, so I suspect that it was on the additional video that he was allowed to see, and that it was after the murder and before perp disappeared from cameras. JMO
 
I just have a general question- I usually like having links to articles handy, but do we have to continue to post the same links over and over again? I say this specifically since the press conference has been linked SO MANY times and it slows down the thread. AND this particular case has a thread link, so simply state where it's from. Whenever I see links, I get excited and think it's new and feel disappointed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
The only part I cared about at this juncture was that it was not human. Lol.


Sent from my iPhone
 
So glad shirtgate can be laid to rest!


http://www.fox4news.com/news/154521693-story#.V1XkplbtCkE.mailto


Sent from my iPhone


Sent from my iPhone

AMEN To THAT!!! here's another link. LOL these 2 are the ones on top of this Story/Case Fox4 and NBCDFW 5

Midlothian police say lab tests show blood on a shirt Missy Bevers' father-in-law dropped off at a dry cleaning business is not human blood.

The family said the blood came from a family dog, who was involved in a fight with another family member's dog. Police said the test results from the University of North Texas Science Center Laboratory show the blood was definitively not from a human.
Published 7 minutes ago
http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Bl...Father-in-Law-Not-Human-Police-382015901.html
 
Me too! When were family members EVER suspects according to LE? As far as I know, they have never had suspects to rule out! Did I miss something? JMO

I don't believe you missed anything. They just work from the inside and LE in the most recent presser officially cleared their alibis..just my interpretation. IMO


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
194
Guests online
550
Total visitors
744

Forum statistics

Threads
625,600
Messages
18,506,838
Members
240,820
Latest member
patrod6622
Back
Top