stephaniejanes
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2017
- Messages
- 155
- Reaction score
- 1,168
Each piece of circumstantial evidence on its own may not be damning but put ALL of it together and it's pretty convincing.
Agreed - almost all criminal convictions are through a collection of circumstantial evidence. This is particularly apparent in "cold" cases that do eventually get solved. And you're right - DNA itself is circumstantial as unless you have proof of how it got there it do
Yes ... but ... did Toni also delete any alleged messages? If I delete my p.ms then they're no longer on my phone but, they remain on yours
thats true, I know Instagram released option to "unsend" a message, though I think this
13:53
Alesha's dad's phone number among accused's contacts
The court has heard Robert MacPhail and Toni McLachlan’s phone numbers were among the accused’s contacts.
At around 1.40am on July 2, a call was made to Mr MacPhail, before a message was sent to Ms McLachlan at 1.47am, jurors were told.
A return call to the accused from Ms McLachlan’s number is then said to have been made at 6.29am.
Mr Benson said there was no evidence the accused and Ms McLachlan had communicated on Instagram.
The IT expert added: “That did not feature in any of the evidence recovered from Toni-Louise McLachlan’s phone.”
Alesha MacPhail teen suspect's phone 'used to Google "How do police find DNA"'
For defence theory to work, he would have to argue she deleted the messages and so did he - for whatever reason. Seems far fetched in my opinion but I guess they are free to argue that.