Gardenista
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2016
- Messages
- 19,034
- Reaction score
- 157,598
I don't think we do.
Uh-oh. More circumstantial evidence.
I don't think we do.
Agreed - almost all criminal convictions are through a collection of circumstantial evidence. This is particularly apparent in "cold" cases that do eventually get solved. And you're right - DNA itself is circumstantial as unless you have proof of how it got there it do
thats true, I know Instagram released option to "unsend" a message, though I think this
For defence theory to work, he would have to argue she deleted the messages and so did he - for whatever reason. Seems far fetched in my opinion but I guess they are free to argue that.
How do we know 100% they are his jogging pants? Was his name written in them?
Me neitherI don't think we do.
How do we know 100% they are his jogging pants? Was his name written in them?
But could they be similar brand ? Eg could any of the victims family own a similar pairHis mum confirmed that she believed that the clothing found was his I think.
When shown a black Nike hoodie, the woman said: "I assume it could be his."His mum confirmed that she believed that the clothing found was his I think.
But could they be similar brand ? Eg could any of the victims family own a similar pair
When shown a black Nike hoodie, the woman said: "I assume it could be his."
And quizzed about the jogging bottoms and boxer shorts found on the beach, the woman told the court: "They do look like his." Daily Record
I doubt it too but I was referring to the joggersI very much doubt Toni wears mens boxer shorts ...