Yes but fibers would still have been on Aleshas clothes if it was worn duringClearly, the black nike top was not being worn when alesha was being carried or it was washed clean of fibres(if possible) before being left “fresh (looking)”on the beach
Yes but fibers would still have been on Aleshas clothes if it was worn duringClearly, the black nike top was not being worn when alesha was being carried or it was washed clean of fibres(if possible) before being left “fresh (looking)”on the beach
Quite a lot of circumstantial evidence has been produced but for me the most difficult for the defence to explain away would be his mother agreeing the boxers on the beach looked like her son’s...she probably would have washed them plenty of times for him even if she hadn’t bought them for him...I really can’t see the defence being able explain this away. This really is a tragic case, I, like others, am beginning to believe his own mother knows it was her own son that committed this terrible crime...
Indeed so it was not worn whilst carrying the little girl. The accused said he gave it to TMc...surely if she was trying to frame him she would have used it but it has come up clean assuming of course this is the actual top he left his house wearing...Yes but fibers would still have been on Aleshas clothes if it was worn during
I think the cctv would be on night vision so it wouldn’t be able to differentiate colours. Dark grey joggers would appear black etcSo he had grey joggers on at 12.30 and black joggers at 1.54 when he left the house?
I am struggling with what the person carrying alesha was wearing. I assumed they had their head covered, explains a hoody being worn by the accused. But how did no fibre transfer to her clothing? Was she wrapped in say a blanket? Was the hoody then removed at the wooded area before the rest of the crime was to take place, then be thrown onto the sea after? Regarding CCTV of shoreline I thought the figures head was covered.Indeed so it was not worn whilst carrying the little girl. The accused said he gave it to TMc...surely if she was trying to frame him she would have used it but it has come up clean assuming of course this is the actual top he left his house wearing...
Impossible to imagine what hell that woman must be going through. If there is any substance to rumours she must be destroyed. She couldn’t have known her son was capable of such a thing, who could really.? I bet she blames herself too it’s just horrific all round No matter what the outcome she has to deal with it all too
I think the cctv would be on night vision so it wouldn’t be able to differentiate colours. Dark grey joggers would appear black etc
Who said the figure’s head was “covered” please?I am struggling with what the person carrying alesha was wearing. I assumed they had their head covered, explains a hoody being worn by the accused. But how did no fibre transfer to her clothing? Was she wrapped in say a blanket? Was the hoody then removed at the wooded area before the rest of the crime was to take place, then be thrown onto the sea after? Regarding CCTV of shoreline I thought the figures head was covered.
I must be mistaken then. I thought o had read that online. Should o delete my post? Apologies, new hereWho said the figure’s head was “covered” please?
But the 30 fibres forensics found were described as being “black”
I must be mistaken then. I thought o had read that online. Should o delete my post? Apologies, new here
Photographic evidence showed a kitchen knife and several items of male clothing, including a pair of men's boxer shorts, jogging bottoms and a hooded top, which were discovered near her body.
Images showed an inside-out pair of men's grey jogging bottoms with a pair of men's boxer shorts inside.
The joggers washed up on the beach were deffinitley grey
Sarah Jones, a forensic scientist, also gave evidence on the sixth day of the trial.So why on earth are forensics talking about 30 “black” fibres ?
Shows how important it is not to go on what I think I’ve read but be clear on factsDon’t worry about it. I’m new too. Nice to meet you
Sarah Jones, a forensic scientist, also gave evidence on the sixth day of the trial.
She told the court that her studies showed a total of 69 black and grey fibres from jogging trousers and boxers recovered from the shoreline on the island were "indistinguishable" from those found on Alesha's clothes.
A mixture of both grey and black. Maybe the joggers were grey but the cord ties ( that you tighten around your waist ) were black maybe? I don’t know
Shows how important it is not to go on what I think I’ve read but be clear on facts
Yes I read that too...either the reporting is not good and confusing us or the court case is a messI’ve just read a report that states he was wearing all black when he left god knows what the truth is
Yes I read that too...either the reporting is not good and confusing us or the court case is a mess
Yes I read that too...either the reporting is not good and confusing us or the court case is a mess