- Joined
- Apr 29, 2014
- Messages
- 994
- Reaction score
- 2,917
Not that I believe this for a second, but it’d be more likely that he went to try and find Madeleine than that he wanted to disappear like Madeleine, IMO.
Andrew's disappearance is heavily linked to trafficking
By "link" I meant that this is the most common theoryIs it? I don't think there is *evidence* he was abducted or trafficked. At least no evidence that has been released. It's just one theory or possibility.
(I personally think he was probably abducted, but based on what I think is most likely, not on evidence. This is unfortunately a case with no "known" leads
By "link" I meant that this is the most common theory
I used to hope to Andrew went away to start a new life, but I personally can't see it anymore. I do think he could still be alive on the streets or possibly in captivity.But I hope it's not true. It's so heart-wrenching.
I used to hope to Andrew went away to start a new life, but I personally can't see it anymore. I do think he could still be alive on the streets or possibly in captivity.
What is your opinion on my drug trafficking theory?I don't think he is being held captive. I think he was preyed upon by an opportunist hanging around the station and sadly was most likely dead by the end of the day.
It's also possible that he was abducted off the street by an organised paedophile ring, and he looked slightly younger than 14 so it's not implausible that he was taken and used, but that still means to me that he is long disposed of.
Of course I hope neither of these things happened and Andrew chose to leave for whatever reason, and is alive and well somewhere just living the life he wanted. I do wish that if this is what happened he finds it in his heart to let his parents know he is safe and well. They deserve that peace of mind.
What is your opinion on my drug trafficking theory?
Why? It seems more likely than him being in captivity or that he started a new life off his own back.I think it's highly unlikely.
He's not exactly what drug traffickers look for in a mule. Stable family with stable income, very likely to be missed and searched for. Typically, they go for more vulnerable individuals with little to no support system to notice they're gone.Why? It seems more likely than him being in captivity or that he started a new life off his own back.
Andrew seemed "vulnerable" in that he would probably be easily manipulated.He's not exactly what drug traffickers look for in a mule. Stable family with stable income, very likely to be missed and searched for. Typically, they go for more vulnerable individuals with little to no support system to notice they're gone.
JMO, AFAIK, etc.
But there COULD be a link between this case and Alex Sloley. I would also like to see the police investigate a possible link with the Ruth Wilson case.This is just such a confusing case, because it's not even known if he was lured to London by someone or just wanted to spend a day there but was seen and then targeted by someone. And if he was lured or randomly targeted, how did they manage to do it? And why seemingly only him and no other victims targeted from London?
(Aside from some people wondering whether there is a link between Andrew and Alex Sloley's case.)
But there COULD be a link between this case and Alex Sloley. I would also like to see the police investigate a possible link with the Ruth Wilson case.
I looked up about Alex Sloley and it sounds like he was probably murdered due to a gang dispute.I don't know how police could investigate whether the cases are related when/if they have no leads in the cases.
It's just my speculation that no one but Andrew and whomever abducted him knows where he is, and if Alex's friends know something, they were too afraid to talk. I don't know enough about Ruth's case. But I think all three cases seem to have significantly different circumstances.
ETA: But JMO. Of course I could be wrong.