greenpalm
I don't say much unless I've really thought it thr
- Joined
- Jun 14, 2010
- Messages
- 1,028
- Reaction score
- 38
This must be wrong?!! It contrasts with everything we have heard thus far.
What I find very, very odd, is that the accused would allegedly abduct a child with NO WAY of knowing whether he was spotted doing this, and then going about his business as normal the next day, dropping off his car at a repair shop, walking along the river, walking along the main road, out in public and making NO ATTEMPT AT HIDING WHATSOEVER.
I completely agree. How could he have known an adult wasn't watching out a window? We know that the pensioner saw the kids playing, and then seemingly vanish, so it was possible that someone would see him, and we know the other child saw her get into the vehicle. Unless he'd gone completely out of his head, which I suppose we can't rule out. It doesn't make sense.
I pointed out earlier in the thread that Philip Garido took Jacee Dugard in plain sight, but he didn't stick around and come out strolling the next day, he drove off with her.
That's the other reason I've been motivated to come up with an accident/panic scenario, because even if he wanted to do this deliberately, why do it where you're almost sure to get caught?