Deceased/Not Found UK - April Jones, 5, Machynlleth, Wales, 1 Oct 2012 #5 *M. Bridger guilty*

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #361
Family facebook page angry that the press have said it.

The family wouldn't have known she was in his car *this* time if she hadn't gone missing. I don't care what they think they know, we know it is possible for April to get into a car without any member of her family knowing she is doing so.
 
  • #362
The family wouldn't have known she was in his car *this* time if she hadn't gone missing. I don't care what they think they know, we know it is possible for April to get into a car without any member of her family knowing she is doing so.
If that is the case, then who ever saw the recent car was the one who compared it to that car. How else could they say they had been in that vehicle before?
 
  • #363
  • #364
AF = Sister of the most recent ex?
 
  • #365
If that is the case, then who ever saw the recent car was the one who compared it to that car. How else could they say they had been in that vehicle before?

I'm not following your logic here. The AF quote was printed on 3rd Oct after MB was arrested on the 2nd Oct. It's entirely possible that soon after his arrest, April's friends were asked by their parents if they had ever got in his car before and that's when it came to light that they had done so a couple of days earlier.
 
  • #366
If that is the case, then who ever saw the recent car was the one who compared it to that car. How else could they say they had been in that vehicle before?

I seem to remember this part of the story being introduced as "it emerged that..." The claim that she had been in the car before was presented as if it emerged after everyone would have known "the car they've got is Mark Bridger's landrover". In which case someone could say "she was in Mark's car on such and such a day before". Obviously it would have been a bit odd if they had said, on Monday night, "oh yes she was in a light grey van little at the front and big at the back a couple of days ago".
 
  • #367
Brain is so full of 'stuff' about this case that I no longer know what I know - apologies. Please remind me who Kaz Griffith's is and why her post should be read as Gospel.
 
  • #368
Brain is so full of 'stuff' about this case that I no longer know what I know - apologies. Please remind me who Kaz Griffith's is and why her post should be read as Gospel.

What post. There does not seem to be much on her FB page.
 
  • #369
The difference is that that is discussed in people's lounges or on the street corners, not typed on a public forum for posterity.

One word: Facebook. Granted, some pages and accounts can be set to private, but still...
 
  • #370
Hiya first post here although I'm a avid reader :blushing:

Kaz Griffiths is Elaine Griffiths/Dafydds sister. Elaine is the ex partner of MB and Kaz (Karen) is the ex partner of Paul Jones.
 
  • #371
  • #372
Brain is so full of 'stuff' about this case that I no longer know what I know - apologies. Please remind me who Kaz Griffith's is and why her post should be read as Gospel.

I'm not sure we're considering the post as gospel, as we shouldn't be taking MSM as gospel either. It's hard to know at this stage exactly what the truth is.
 
  • #373
Reposting nursebeeme's recent post for those who may have missed it or need a reminder.....

Originally Posted by nursebeeme
reminder: sleuthing or speculating about April's family is OFF LIMITS.
 
  • #374
Hiya first post here although I'm a avid reader :blushing:

Kaz Griffiths is Elaine Griffiths/Dafydds sister. Elaine is the ex partner of MB and Kaz (Karen) is the ex partner of Paul Jones.

Thanks for that Untidyhedgehog - the relationships are so intertwined it's hard to keep track of who was with who!

Welcome to WebSleuths

:welcome6:
 
  • #375
  • #376
The family wouldn't have known she was in his car *this* time if she hadn't gone missing. I don't care what they think they know, we know it is possible for April to get into a car without any member of her family knowing she is doing so.


This could perhaps coincide with.April.attending a birthday party 48hrs before (in papers yesterday)
What is the significance of giving the.public that.information? Seems irrelevant really unless that's a possible defence drip fed to the press to explain how possible dna could.be in.the.car (assuming it.was found)
 
  • #377
Wonder why it was initially said by someone that she was ?

It was quoted from the sister of his last partner VF. Don't know when or by who retracted.
 
  • #378
reminder on social media rules:
Social Networks

Regarding Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and other social networking or blog websites: Links may be used to direct posters to view something on a social networking page. But postings on social networking sites are not considered fact; they are rumor. Copying and pasting, or taking screen caps, directly from these pages is not allowed. Paraphrasing is okay. (Exception: If the Twitter or Facebook post belongs to a verified news station, it may be copied. But a link should still be provided.)

Also, social networking pages may only be linked if they are directly related to a case, i.e. the victim or suspect. We don't want to post to someone's mother, brother, employer, milkman, or postal carrier just because they know the main player. We also NEVER link to minor's pages (unless they are the victim). And be sure that the page actually belongs to the person being discussed. Do not link to someone if you are not 100% sure it is the correct person. And if a social networking is set to private and you get in the back way, you may not post what you find. Private means private!
Rules Etiquette & Information - Websleuths Crime Sleuthing Community
 
  • #379
This could perhaps coincide with.April.attending a birthday party 48hrs before (in papers yesterday)
What is the significance of giving the.public that.information? Seems irrelevant really unless that's a possible defence drip fed to the press to explain how possible dna could.be in.the.car (assuming it.was found)

I just think the press were reporting everything they heard, while they were still allowed to. Their agenda is to sell as much news as possible, as truthfully as possible, not to censor out anything not of use to the search or investigation.
 
  • #380
This could perhaps coincide with.April.attending a birthday party 48hrs before (in papers yesterday)
What is the significance of giving the.public that.information? Seems irrelevant really unless that's a possible defence drip fed to the press to explain how possible dna could.be in.the.car (assuming it.was found)

LE didn't give the public that informtion. It came to light as a result of the press trying to interview as many people as they could, probably for background stories. It probably is irrelevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
1,599
Total visitors
1,733

Forum statistics

Threads
632,314
Messages
18,624,588
Members
243,083
Latest member
Delmajesty
Back
Top