Little Jedi
"I am free of all prejudices. I hate everyone equa
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2012
- Messages
- 984
- Reaction score
- 51
I should damn well hope NHS covers any treatment costs at the least !
PARENTS REQUEST SPANISH CITIZENSHIP FOR ASHYA
http://www.rtve.es/noticias/mas-24/
According to the Spanish channel RTV.es Canal 24 the parents claim that they still have custody of their son Ashya.
They request that their son be given the Spanish nationality, to which he has a right because he was born there.
Given that he's habitually resident in the UK, I can't see that that would make much difference.
Press Gazette:
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/conten...hya-king-story...The hospital knew very well that the family knew how to operate the feeding machine that has been at the centre of the hunt. The hospital knew very well where the family were heading - the Czech clinic had sent it papers last month, seeking medical background so that it could take over Ashya's care. The hospital knew that Brett King had a property business based in Malaga. There was no mystery here.
There was certainly a concern about Ashya's well-being, but why parade the Jehovah's Witness red herring when there was much more useful information that could have been released?
In the absence of that information, the papers went hard on the religion angle, albeit generally with the caveat "their motive is unclear..." - when, as we now know, it was clear right from the start.
BBM
BBMThere was certainly a concern about Ashya's well-being, but why parade the Jehovah's Witness red herring when there was much more useful information that could have been released?
In the absence of that information, the papers went hard on the religion angle, albeit generally with the caveat "their motive is unclear..." - when, as we now know, it was clear right from the start.
How much do most of us know about the Jehovah's Witnesses' view on medical treatment? That they refuse blood transfusions. But this little boy had had surgery. The Witnesses helped with this statement:
There is absolutely no indication that their decision is in any way motivated by any religious convictions. Jehovah's Witnesses are encouraged to seek the best medical treatment for themselves and their children.
PRESS SHOULD HAVE BEEN MORE QUESTIONING OF ESTABLISHMENT AT THE OUTSET OF ASHYA KING STORY
Press Gazette:
http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/conte...tioning-establishment-outset-ashya-king-story
<Respectfully snipped for space and relevance>
Nobody wants anything but the best for Ashya King - but, my goodness, everybody seems to have conspired to bring about the worst.
And in case there was any doubt about who was at fault here, we were generally told within the first five pars that the parents were Jehovah's Witnesses. Would we be expected to have been told if they were members of the United Reformed Church or Rastafarians?
The hospital and police may argue that the information was released because the family was known to be devout and might make their way to a Kingdom Hall. Well, let them argue that all they want. The hospital knew exactly where they were going and why. We were told that they were Jehovah's Witnesses to provoke one reaction - which it duly did.
[Jehova's Witnesses alledgedly refuse blood transfusions and other medical treatment ]
There was certainly a concern about Ashya's well-being, but why parade the Jehovah's Witness red herring when there was much more useful information that could have been released?
In the absence of that information, the papers went hard on the religion angle, albeit generally with the caveat "their motive is unclear..." - when, as we now know, it was clear right from the start.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.