I think locksmith is an interesting possibility. It's certainly a job where people have to be mobile and work late at night.Is it really unreasonable of me that I read about this and immediately googled locksmiths and auto lockmiths in the Bath area, and it immediately showed me one I looked up on a publicly available government website which showed a man born in a year which would tally with a possible perpetrator, who elsewhere on the internet is shown in a photo with blue eyes ( I don't know if he has a mark below his mouth, worth checking?)? The most recent photo is from fourteen years ago. There is one other person in specifically auto locksmithing in the area but there is no photo available, and they are also of the right age - born in the early 70s. I don't want to make people think innocent people are guilty. With the abrupt end to perpetrating, I always hoped the person had gone to prison for something else, or else been discovered and finished by someone. I find the forced driving back to the journey start particularly odd. Even driving somewhere seemed risky for the perpetrator, and I truly don't understand the lack of DNA from the ridiculous hat. The newspapers disrespect victims by making out the crimes are cartoonish with this nickname. I wish they'd have sensitivity as if a family member had been raped. I find the case horrific and weird. One of the people which came up straight away lives extremely near to the area where the crimes were committed in newspaper reports. This made me wonder if driving there was necessary for a specific reason. Did they associate that area with something? Did they film it and have something already set up? Did they know that area better, or own land there they knew would not be visited? I haven't seen any of these things considered in reports.
I would expect the perp to have been born before the early 70s, but I might be wrong.
Driving the victims is indeed unusual. Could it be because he has an identifiable work vehicle, which he can't use during attacks, but has to return to afterwards?
I doubt very much if he was filming the attacks, or if he owned the land where any of the abduction attacks took place. Some of the attacks took place in the grounds of the university, a museum etc.
He seemed to know that he was unlikely to be disturbed, which suggests a familiarity with the whole of Bath (including the outskirts) rather than just the city centre.