Maybe she thought it was irrelevant and shouldn't be given in evidence.Why was she ranting? Did he ask for chicken without mayonnaise?![]()
I do wish the media would stop labelling her "aristocrat". It's ridiculous.
Maybe she thought it was irrelevant and shouldn't be given in evidence.Why was she ranting? Did he ask for chicken without mayonnaise?![]()
They're stuck in the Lady Chatterley's Lover groove.Maybe she thought it was irrelevant and shouldn't be given in evidence.
I do wish the media would stop labelling her "aristocrat". It's ridiculous.
As I understand it, he wanted his food that they'd just bought, and all of it rather than just some of it. That's not demanding that the police wait on him.Why was she ranting? Did he ask for chicken without mayonnaise?![]()
Was there evidence that they had lived and slept in the shed? I've wondered about that.I am not sure of the relevance of this anyway. But maybe others can explain. The prosecution allege (and the defence/ defendants did not offer any other info at the first trial) that from the time they arrived by taxi in the Newhaven area they were camping in the tent and later (after the death of the baby) moved to the shed. So we know that either the baby was alive in the tent, dead in the tent, and dead in the shed.
But the police was trying to find a baby, a baby is more important than a sandwich.As I understand it, he wanted his food that they'd just bought, and all of it rather than just some of it. That's not demanding that the police wait on him.
More interesting is whether the two of them bought any food for her.
Yes of course. At that time didn't she tell the police "He's got a mental health problem" or something like that? In court last time she also said the police edited out the bit where they assaulted him. I can't remember whether they asked him where his child was at that time, or whether they just asked her. (Edit: Yes they did ask him, and on at least one occasion he replied "Can I have my food please?")But the police was trying to find a baby, a baby is more important than a sandwich.
Yes of course. At that time didn't she tell the police "He's got a mental health problem" or something like that? In court last time she also said the police edited out the bit where they assaulted him. I can't remember whether they asked him where his child was at that time, or whether they just asked her. (Edit: Yes they did ask him, and on at least one occasion he replied "Can I have my food please?")
She seems very protective of him. (JMO)
Okay but I think this was his own food that they'd just bought, and he was possibly literally starving, which affects mind as well as body, and he knew their daughter had died several weeks before, so it's possible to make too much out of the mayonnaise.IIRC it was released into the public domain that MG had asked many times for food after being apprehended and whilst refusing to say where the baby was. He requested a chicken sandwich specifically and this was provided him but he then wanted mayonnaise for it, saying it was a human rights issue.
I believe it was said he demanded this sandwich then mayonnaise at least forty times in the immediate aftermath of being captured and that he also refused to sit in a chair and threw himself on the floor then refused help to get up as well as claiming medical issues and accusing officers of assaulting him.
All the while LE were urgently asking as they were hoping to maybe locate the baby alive.![]()
As I understand it, he wanted his food that they'd just bought, and all of it rather than just some of it. That's not demanding that the police wait on him.
More interesting is whether the two of them bought any food for her.
Was there evidence that they had lived and slept in the shed? I've wondered about that.
He might have known the baby had died. But the police didn't know that, they were trying to locate a tiny baby that had potentially been left alone in a cold tent. Which is why they asked him over and over where is the baby.Okay but I think this was his own food that they'd just bought, and he was possibly literally starving, which affects mind as well as body, and he knew their daughter had died several weeks before, so it's possible to make too much out of the mayonnaise.
It may have been that they kept repeating something at him, ignoring the one thing that he was saying to them, so he kept repeating what he was saying too.
Regarding "threw himself on the floor" while he was in custody at the police station, it would be good to hear his side. As indeed about everything else for that matter.
The way the police officer told him to "Drop it! Now!" with regard to his walking stick reminded me of how many dog owners speak to their pets.
I'm not sure why it was thought necessary to bring him in chains to the magistrates' court either, when he is not accused of violence.
![]()
Constance Marten and Mark Gordon in court charged with manslaughter of baby girl as post-mortem unable to establish cause of death
The body of the child, named Victoria, was found wrapped in a plastic bag under some nappies in an unlocked shed near to where Constance Marten and Mark Gordon had been camping on an overgrown allotment plot in Brighton, Crawley Magistrates' Court was told.news.sky.com
![]()
Constance Marten's lover demands mayo and crisps as he's asked if baby is dead
Newly released police footage shows Mark Gordon demanding mayonnaise for his chicken as he and partner Constance Marten are arrested by police over the death of their infant daughterwww.mirror.co.uk
Okay but I think this was his own food that they'd just bought, and he was possibly literally starving, which affects mind as well as body, and he knew their daughter had died several weeks before, so it's possible to make too much out of the mayonnaise.
It may have been that they kept repeating something at him, ignoring the one thing that he was saying to them, so he kept repeating what he was saying too.
Regarding "threw himself on the floor" while he was in custody at the police station, it would be good to hear his side. As indeed about everything else for that matter.
The way the police officer told him to "Drop it! Now!" with regard to his walking stick reminded me of how many dog owners speak to their pets.
I'm not sure why it was thought necessary to bring him in chains to the magistrates' court either, when he is not accused of violence.
![]()
Constance Marten and Mark Gordon in court charged with manslaughter of baby girl as post-mortem unable to establish cause of death
The body of the child, named Victoria, was found wrapped in a plastic bag under some nappies in an unlocked shed near to where Constance Marten and Mark Gordon had been camping on an overgrown allotment plot in Brighton, Crawley Magistrates' Court was told.news.sky.com
![]()
Constance Marten's lover demands mayo and crisps as he's asked if baby is dead
Newly released police footage shows Mark Gordon demanding mayonnaise for his chicken as he and partner Constance Marten are arrested by police over the death of their infant daughterwww.mirror.co.uk
He might have known the baby had died. But the police didn't know that, they were trying to locate a tiny baby that had potentially been left alone in a cold tent. Which is why they asked him over and over where is the baby.
Asking him to drop the walking stick is standard protocol for anyone that has a 'weapon'. He could have whacked it round a police officers head for all they knew.
If I was searching for a baby potentially in a life threatening condition I would be telling him to wait for food too!
Exactly! Very lucky he wasn't at the very least taseredUnbelievably people have been shot dead in the street by UK armed police for way less than that. Harry Stanley, Jean Charles de Menezes, Mark Duggan.
Okay but I think this was his own food that they'd just bought, and he was possibly literally starving, which affects mind as well as body, and he knew their daughter had died several weeks before, so it's possible to make too much out of the mayonnaise.
The dynamic may have been that they kept repeating something at him, ignoring the one thing that he was saying to them, so he kept repeating what he was saying too.
Regarding "threw himself on the floor" while he was in custody at the police station, it would be good to hear his side. As indeed about everything else for that matter.
The way the police officer told him to "Drop it! Now!" with regard to his walking stick reminded me of how many dog owners speak to their pets.
I'm not sure why it was thought necessary to bring him in chains to the magistrates' court either, when he is not accused of violence.
![]()
Constance Marten and Mark Gordon in court charged with manslaughter of baby girl as post-mortem unable to establish cause of death
The body of the child, named Victoria, was found wrapped in a plastic bag under some nappies in an unlocked shed near to where Constance Marten and Mark Gordon had been camping on an overgrown allotment plot in Brighton, Crawley Magistrates' Court was told.news.sky.com
![]()
Constance Marten's lover demands mayo and crisps as he's asked if baby is dead
Newly released police footage shows Mark Gordon demanding mayonnaise for his chicken as he and partner Constance Marten are arrested by police over the death of their infant daughterwww.mirror.co.uk
At a guess, I would say that the prosecutions case is around the cold and the inadequate shelter the couple chose. It could be argued both ways though.I am not sure of the relevance of this anyway. But maybe others can explain. The prosecution allege (and the defence/ defendants did not offer any other info at the first trial) that from the time they arrived by taxi in the Newhaven area they were camping in the tent and later (after the death of the baby) moved to the shed. So we know that either the baby was alive in the tent, dead in the tent, and dead in the shed.
You could apply the same thinking to the day before they were arrested. It could be that she was in quite a state. ISTR that as well as saying she wanted an examination to find out what had happened to her daughter she said she didn't know what to do and that she felt guilty. Strictly logically that combination of three statements can doubtless be picked apart and shown as self-contradictory, but I am not sure it contains anything that sounds like lying. In addition it could be that they didn't trust the police. The notion the police spread in the media that after the arrest they needed to act quickly because the baby might still be alive struck me as somewhat questionable to say the least. (JMO)CM said they didn’t bury Victoria because they wanted to preserve her body for an autopsy. If that was the truth, he would have straightaway led the authorities to Victoria’s body, not deflect and cause trouble the way he did. They both lie and did not want Victoria found. If the police hadn’t found Victoria, she would still be missing to this day.
SBMOkay but I think this was his own food that they'd just bought, and he was possibly literally starving, which affects mind as well as body, and he knew their daughter had died several weeks before, so it's possible to make too much out of the mayonnaise.
The dynamic may have been that they kept repeating something at him, ignoring the one thing that he was saying to them, so he kept repeating what he was saying too.
Regarding "threw himself on the floor" while he was in custody at the police station, it would be good to hear his side. As indeed about everything else for that matter...
Can anyone tell me where, if anywhere, the retrial is being reported upon? I can't seem to find a source for CM''s most recent ranting episode at the Old Bailey earlier this week. TIA.