I feel like this is exactly what happened imoLooking at the photo in the bus station I'm surprised the poor baby wasn't suffocated to death as her coat is totally zipped up with nowhere for air for the poor thing
I feel like this is exactly what happened imoLooking at the photo in the bus station I'm surprised the poor baby wasn't suffocated to death as her coat is totally zipped up with nowhere for air for the poor thing
Am I the only one who finds the pictures of the burned out car utterly shocking? When the original news story broke about the car and the placenta, I was imagining something much milder.
I find it puzzling too. How did the placenta escape being completely incinerated, when you look at how totally the upholstery of both front seats has been destroyed?
The shot seems to be taken across the back seat from offside to nearside. You can see the burnt out frames of the seats - driver's seat still in place, passenger seat tipped forward, passenger door open.
Assuming the pixelled-out bit is the placenta, is that a laptop beneath it, still protected by the cardboard delivery packaging? How is that not burned to a cinder too?
All I can think of is that they originally salvaged them from the car but then decided they couldn't carry them and put them back into the smoking remains of the car. Is that plausible? I've got no idea how fast a car fire ignites and then subsides, or whether anything's known about how long they stayed nearby.
I can't see how anything in there wasn't totally destroyed.
JMO
My thoughts exactly. Imo they had very little love for victoria, more of a spite thing against authority. What did they really think would happen if victoria hadn't died...living in a tent with a screaming toddler. They are both totally delusionalIMO I don't think they were on the run to keep the baby, I don't think they cared about poor Victoria same way they easily abandoned their 4th child.
I'm assuming they paid by card for the lodge, it wasn't until someone recognised them that they realised there was police and media campaign to find them, only then did they lived more off the grid.
No, you’re not the only one. I was also expecting something much milder especially after hearing the reports of the placenta wrapped in a towel, CM’s passport and mobile phones being found- I wrongly thought they must have been easily findable and identifiable.
I’m definitely no fire expert, but maybe the towel with the placenta wrapped in it was wet and that protected it to some extent? I honestly don’t know.
I know nothing about cars. Is it possible that they had the motor on to give light and heat whilst she gave birth and it caused problems with an old engine in a cheap second hand car and when driven over heated.I was also very surprised to see that photo of the car. Do we know what caused the fire? Has anything been said about this?
Dunno but there are three of them.I'm wondering what the smaller blurred out things are in the car photo, on the right
subtle but interesting image isnt it
plus the line about there being a link available if she wants to join…makes her sound like a guest …rather than a person on trial
just editing to add….
CM is also being referred to as the second defendant.
I have never heard this term used in any other multiple defendant trial
My interpretation was they scooped up a fair few items from the car and then somewhere in the field realised they'd taken too many for what might well turn out to be some serious-scale moving about without their own vehicle for a while and decided to jettison some.The think that surprised me was that they had no possessions yet it has been reported they abandoned things in a field. Surely they could have rescued a few important items .
So the reason for her absence from court seems no longer to be her conferring with her legal team.Oh I see, I mistook the nuances of the original comment earlier.
Yes looks like MG is being positioned to be the fall guy and CM is being kept safe from the trials (literally!) and tribulations of court (and him).
It's interesting in terms of who has the wealth, privilege, connections, and power and who has... well, none of those.
JMO MOO
If he had had a serious condition affecting his feet,I would have thought he would have been admitted to hospital immediately after his arrest.
If they take the stand, the judge might well have to instruct the jury that if they aren't sure that both defendants are lying, then they've got to acquit, at least on manslaughter, child cruelty, and allowing a child's death - and that thinking they're probably lying isn't sufficient. "You've heard them give evidence, members of the jury - it's up to you, what view you take of it. But as a matter of law..." This is speculation of course, but it might well turn out to apply if the two narratives and explanations regarding the accepted facts diverge the way they seem to be diverging. The prosecution would need to persuade 10 of the 12 jurors to a point that they were sure that they were definitely both lying. The defence would need to persuade 3 to the contrary.I would be surprised if either of them took the stand. I imagine they will only make things worse for themselves.
Looking at the photo in the bus station I'm surprised the poor baby wasn't suffocated to death as her coat is totally zipped up with nowhere for air for the poor thing
I imagine that the need to get away from the burning car and disappear was their priority as the arrival of the fire service/police etc would have caught them there and then.The think that surprised me was that they had no possessions yet it has been reported they abandoned things in a field. Surely they could have rescued a few important items .
If that's true, then she is a nutcase to such an extent that it will come out easily in cross-examination if not in her evidence in chief. It doesn't sound true to me, given that she'd given birth in the hospital the day before. What if she hadn't discharged herself? Would they have kicked her out for not having a Covid test? Or by the next day was she in visitor rather than mother category and the rules state etc. The defence are likely to insist that the witness who is saying this about the Covid test comes and says it in the witness box.Covid test, not vaccination. She would rather refuse a test than see her baby. Disgusting.