I tried watching that video, but when they implied the police were responsible for the second wound to Sheila's neck, I about died. It's disgusting that these people are trying to implicate Sheila in this tragic murder and making about her psychosis, police mishandling and negligent discharge while handling the rifle. Taking out all the evidence regarding the bible placement, double wounds to her neck, her loosely surmised state of mind, suppressor information, and more, how does one even remotely explain her extremely clean body AND blood trail down her night gown that is vertically driven?
I have seen the body of Sheila, and several photos are online in color. You can clearly see her hands were very clean, nails not dirty or broken, her feet were clean, the nightgown not torn, messy, bloody (except her blood). Nothing at all even remotely suggests she could have ran around among blood and struggled with her 6'4" father, then bludgeoned him with the stock of the rifle, thus breaking the stock. The broken stock is seen in the photos of Sheila with the rifle on her body. She has literally no bruises or anything on her body. BUT, those horrible people want to claim she had cuts on her, which is simply not true and the photos show that fact. They have an agenda - to blame a mentally unwell girl and posit the story Jeremy wants them to believe. I am really bothered by it, despite being an old case. The blaming of a girl who would have had to kill her children, when that is not supported makes me sick. A girl on antipsychotics that make you tired, weak, and less capable of someone without medication in their system.
Then the asinine assertion that the police just botched the whole crime scene, as if to set Jeremy up when a month transpired before Julie Mugford clued them in to the real perpetrator. Up to that point, Essex police believed it was a suicide, given the lack of forensic knowledge they had in 1985. If anything, did none of them wonder how such a small female could have created such a scene but remained free of any injury or 3rd party blood on them? The children were the only two who did not move from the bed, the mother and father both exited the bed injured.
And going back to the bible. It belonged to the mother and was not placed there by police. The crime scene photos give a sense it was covered in a trail of blood that continued from Sheila's injury, this not placed well after the fact. Again, a ridiculous clouding of the evidence to try and cast doubt on the scene. Jeremy Bamber was known to commit crimes, even stealing from his family and a business they owned with Julie Mugford. Jeremy attempted to sell adult photos of his sister very shortly after the crime. He is a nasty person and it's disturbing anyone wants to remove his guilty verdict. That farm is still, to this day, very remote. Who else would have entered and used a family weapon to commit those murders? I think it's common sense Sheila is an innocent victim. If you have any questions, look at her body at the house and really consider all the blood Nigel and his wife had on/around them, then consider the struggle Nigel would have had with a female or male and see what makes most sense.
I'm sorry, it just makes me mad, lol
