UK - (Former prince) Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

  • #1,421
They live a life we cannot even imagine.

At birth and for twenty-two years, he was second in line to the British throne.

Pretty heady stuff.

I’m not certain that when Mom is The Queen, one thinks of enriching society but everything in your life is certainly excessive by the measure of others.

Just please remember, this man has not committed nor been charged with any crimes.
 
  • #1,422
They live a life we cannot even imagine.

At birth and for twenty-two years, he was second in line to the British throne.

Pretty heady stuff.

I’m not certain that when Mom is The Queen, one thinks of enriching society but everything in your life is certainly excessive by the measure of others.

Just please remember, this man has not committed nor been charged with any crimes.

They live a life we cannot even imagine.

At birth and for twenty-two years, he was second in line to the British throne.

Pretty heady stuff.

I’m not certain that when Mom is The Queen, one thinks of enriching society but everything in your life is certainly excessive by the measure of others.

Just please remember, this man has not committed nor been charged with any crimes.

If not in this lifetime, then definitely in the hereafter.

 
  • #1,423
  • #1,424
  • #1,425
I wish people would now just leave him alone.

"Too shy, shy, hush-hush, eye to eye"
Lalalalala 😂

"Noblesse oblige" IMcommoner'sO
If not, then pay the price.

Victims don't have this privilege to forget.
Their lives are completely changed,
and it is not a good change.

JMO
 
Last edited:
  • #1,426
Andrew certainly was not the only high profile name connected to Epstein yet he has been the only one to have been named and continually in the press. He has had everything he valued removed and it has been recorded that people are concerned about his mental health.
Every one seems to extol mental health but ignores it when it does not fit their agenda.
 
  • #1,427
He is British and it is British Press that names and writes about him.

I'm sure this person has all kinds of MH doctors and therapists when needed.
Unlike common people who have to wait.
VG, as a victim, had terrible problems concerning MH.

Unfortunately, being (in)famous and in addition belonging to a special family
brings consequences.
Not only privileges.

JMO
 
  • #1,428
He is British and it is British Press that names and writes about him.

Im sure this person has all kinds of MH doctors and therapists when needed.
Unlike common people who have to wait.
VG, as a victim, had terrible problems concerning MH.

Unfortunately, being (in)famous and in addition belonging to a special family
brings consequences.
Not only privileges.

JMO

Now it’s Andrew’s fault that he was born to The Queen of England?

Nonsense.

It’s Andrews fault that VG had MH problems?

I don’t think so.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,429
IF VG was a victim, she was NOT a victim of Andrew’s or he’d have been charged with a crime by now.

Why is it that ONLY Prince Andrew has been so viciously attacked??

There are many more wealthy Americans and others but nary a word.
 
  • #1,430
Now it’s Andrew’s fault that he was born to The Queen of England?

Nonsense.

It’s Andrews fault that VG had MH problems?

I don’t think so.

I'm afraid OP didn't understand the meaning of my post 😟
and put words in my mouth I never uttered.

Never mind.

I have no further comments.

I only sent link from BRITISH MSM.
And answered a post quoting mine.

JMO as always
 
  • #1,431
I'm afraid OP didn't understand the meaning of my post 😟
and put words in my mouth I never uttered.

Never mind.

I have no further comments.

I only sent link from BRITISH MSM.
And answered a post quoting mine.

JMO as always
Yes, British MSM, or rather the "red top" tabloids such as Daily Mail, do post articles about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, and other celebrities, as click-baits, because they want as many to click and read their "trash", so that the tabloids get as much money as possible. Each of us can choose if we want to "feed" those tabloids's pockets or not, by deciding what kind of links we post. There are MSM and "MSM".
 
  • #1,432
Yes, British MSM, or rather the "red top" tabloids such as Daily Mail, do post articles about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, and other celebrities, as click-baits, because they want as many to click and read their "trash", so that the tabloids get as much money as possible. Each of us can choose if we want to "feed" those tabloids's pockets or not, by deciding what kind of links we post. There are MSM and "MSM".

MSM & "MSM"??? 🤔 :D
 
  • #1,433
  • #1,434
Andrew certainly was not the only high profile name connected to Epstein yet he has been the only one to have been named and continually in the press. He has had everything he valued removed and it has been recorded that people are concerned about his mental health.
Every one seems to extol mental health but ignores it when it does not fit their agenda.
He clearly isn't the only one, he may be the only one you're interested in defending though.

 
  • #1,435
Now it’s Andrew’s fault that he was born to The Queen of England?

Nonsense.

It’s Andrews fault that VG had MH problems?

I don’t think so.

IF VG was a victim, she was NOT a victim of Andrew’s or he’d have been charged with a crime by now.

Why is it that ONLY Prince Andrew has been so viciously attacked??

There are many more wealthy Americans and others but nary a word.
Dear god. Horrible.
 
  • #1,436
  • #1,437
I am definitely not defending him and in previous posts have agreed he deserved to be stripped of his titles and other honours. I have also posted that other people should be named and am not sure why you think I would not be interested in defending them.
BBM. Ok, show me your posts defending the Clintons, Dershowitz, Trump or anyone else named so far. And what would interest you in defending them like you have done for Andrew?

Because you have clearly defended him.

I'm not sure where you're going with this, but I don't think it's a good look for you.
 
  • #1,438
BBM. Ok, show me your posts defending the Clintons, Dershowitz, Trump or anyone else named so far. And what would interest you in defending them like you have done for Andrew?

Because you have clearly defended him.

I'm not sure where you're going with this, but I don't think it's a good look for you
if I thought any of the people you have mentioned in your post ( you forgot Mandelson) had the same amount of public scrutiny as Andrew over their involvement with Epstein and lost everything they valued and had been recorded as being mentally fragile then I would be posting similar comments if the press kept hounding them.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JDG
  • #1,439
if I thought any of the people you have mentioned in your post had the same amount of public scrutiny as Andrew over their involvement with Epstein and lost everything they valued and had been recorded as being mentally fragile then I would be posting similar comments if the press kept hounding them.
Shame you couldn't have done the same for VRG with the amount of public scrutiny she came under.
 
  • #1,440
.
Shame you couldn't have done the same for VRG with the amount of public scrutiny she came under.
I don't think I was really following the case that closely at the time so was unaware of the public scrutiny.
 
Last edited:

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
132
Guests online
1,526
Total visitors
1,658

Forum statistics

Threads
638,641
Messages
18,731,659
Members
244,505
Latest member
seelyjam
Back
Top