UK - (Former prince) Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

[Dotta]

Now it’s Andrew’s fault that he was born to The Queen of England?

Nonsense.

It’s Andrews fault that VG had MH problems?

I don’t think so.

I'm afraid OP didn't understand the meaning of my post
and put words in my mouth I never uttered.

Never mind.

I have no further comments.

I only sent link from BRITISH MSM.
And answered a post quoting mine.

JMO as always

 

[Rikissa]

I'm afraid OP didn't understand the meaning of my post
and put words in my mouth I never uttered.

Never mind.

I have no further comments.

I only sent link from BRITISH MSM.
And answered a post quoting mine.

JMO as always

Yes, British MSM, or rather the "red top" tabloids such as Daily Mail, do post articles about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, and other celebrities, as click-baits, because they want as many to click and read their "trash", so that the tabloids get as much money as possible. Each of us can choose if we want to "feed" those tabloids's pockets or not, by deciding what kind of links we post. There are MSM and "MSM".

Tabloid journalism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Dotta]

Yes, British MSM, or rather the "red top" tabloids such as Daily Mail, do post articles about Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, and other celebrities, as click-baits, because they want as many to click and read their "trash", so that the tabloids get as much money as possible. Each of us can choose if we want to "feed" those tabloids's pockets or not, by deciding what kind of links we post. There are MSM and "MSM".

Tabloid journalism - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

MSM & "MSM"???

 

[Luna20]

MSM & "MSM"???

Ha! What’s the difference?

 

[lisasimpson2010]

How on earth has Andrew had "everything removed"?? He lived in a vast palace with dozens of household staff to tend to his every need for many years after his horrendous behaviour came to light, and only this month is moving to a smaller residence. But he's still living rent-free in a royal property that is big and grand by most people's standards. Are we supposed to boo hoo that a man who has basically never worked (save his military service decades ago) and has commercialised and sold out his Royal connections in the worst ways, has to move from a massive house to a slightly less massive house? His new home has five bedrooms and he'll still have security and household staff, will still have chefs and cleaners and people to tend to his every whim. He still owns expensive horses and has stables and grooms (who he does not pay for). He lost his title but he's still enjoying almost all the unearned perks of royalty.

Why is it that ONLY Prince Andrew has been so viciously attacked??

Oh please, he is not being "viciously attacked." He's getting press because he's so stupid and arrogant he decided to go on national TV and tell a lot of lies and self-aggrandising nonsense. And because his abusive and rude behaviour towards everyone he comes into contact with has been extremely well known here in Britain for decades. The general public here in the UK has always disliked him because of his long documented history of treating people badly and behaving badly. Obviously some random American businessmen no one has ever heard of before aren't going to get the same level of coverage as a household name celebrity, especially one who decides to do an entire TV show about a rape allegation!

IF VG was a victim, she was NOT a victim of Andrew’s or he’d have been charged with a crime by now.

It's obscene to claim that lack of charges proves innocence, given what a tiny percentage of rapes ever result in charges.

I can tell by your use of language that you are not British and you use terminology that indicates a lack of understanding of our monarchic system, so I don't think you realise how much our Royal Family are completely and entirely above the law here in Britain. They have tremendous legal and political power. There are documents proving that the Queen (the late Queen, not Camilla) personally interceded in large numbers of laws to either ensure that there would be clauses exempting her and her family, or to personally benefit the RF. To give just a few examples, the RF are formally exempt from the laws banning employers from engaging in workplace racial discrimination (including the 2010 UK Equality Act, which is a major law that every single other employer has to obey). They are exempt from animal welfare laws.

Laws passed during Covid banning landlords from evicting tenants during lockdown had explicit exemptions for the RF. The RF are major landlords and they wound up kicking people out of their homes during lockdown and made people homeless at a time when it was pretty much impossible to find new rental properties. The UK Constitutional Law Association later found that "the Crown [had been granted] special and unjustified privileges" in being exempt from Covid legislation.

So the RF are completely above the law in a way most non-Brits have no idea about, since not only do they intercede in the passing of laws and are explicitly exempt from many specific laws, the British police and the British political system effectively answer to the RF. Especially the police. There is absolutely zero chance a major royal would ever be charged with any kind of crime. That's like saying the fact Trump isn't in prison is proof that he's innocent. The only way Andrew would ever be arrested is if he visits America (where he is wanted for questioning) and he'll likely never step foot there again.

 

[simlyme]

How on earth has Andrew had "everything removed"?? He lived in a vast palace with dozens of household staff to tend to his every need for many years after his horrendous behaviour came to light, and only this month is moving to a smaller residence. But he's still living rent-free in a royal property that is big and grand by most people's standards. Are we supposed to boo hoo that a man who has basically never worked (save his military service decades ago) and has commercialised and sold out his Royal connections in the worst ways, has to move from a massive house to a slightly less massive house? His new home has five bedrooms and he'll still have security and household staff, will still have chefs and cleaners and people to tend to his every whim. He still owns expensive horses and has stables and grooms (who he does not pay for). He lost his title but he's still enjoying almost all the unearned perks of royalty.



Oh please, he is not being "viciously attacked." He's getting press because he's so stupid and arrogant he decided to go on national TV and tell a lot of lies and self-aggrandising nonsense. And because his abusive and rude behaviour towards everyone he comes into contact with has been extremely well known here in Britain for decades. The general public here in the UK has always disliked him because of his long documented history of treating people badly and behaving badly. Obviously some random American businessmen no one has ever heard of before aren't going to get the same level of coverage as a household name celebrity, especially one who decides to do an entire TV show about a rape allegation!




It's obscene to claim that lack of charges proves innocence, given what a tiny percentage of rapes ever result in charges.

I can tell by your use of language that you are not British and you use terminology that indicates a lack of understanding of our monarchic system, so I don't think you realise how much our Royal Family are completely and entirely above the law here in Britain. They have tremendous legal and political power. There are documents proving that the Queen (the late Queen, not Camilla) personally interceded in large numbers of laws to either ensure that there would be clauses exempting her and her family, or to personally benefit the RF. To give just a few examples, the RF are formally exempt from the laws banning employers from engaging in workplace racial discrimination (including the 2010 UK Equality Act, which is a major law that every single other employer has to obey). They are exempt from animal welfare laws.

Laws passed during Covid banning landlords from evicting tenants during lockdown had explicit exemptions for the RF. The RF are major landlords and they wound up kicking people out of their homes during lockdown and made people homeless at a time when it was pretty much impossible to find new rental properties. The UK Constitutional Law Association later found that "the Crown [had been granted] special and unjustified privileges" in being exempt from Covid legislation.

So the RF are completely above the law in a way most non-Brits have no idea about, since not only do they intercede in the passing of laws and are explicitly exempt from many specific laws, the British police and the British political system effectively answer to the RF. Especially the police. There is absolutely zero chance a major royal would ever be charged with any kind of crime. That's like saying the fact Trump isn't in prison is proof that he's innocent. The only way Andrew would ever be arrested is if he visits America (where he is wanted for questioning) and he'll likely never step foot there again.

Brilliant !! Thank you !

 

[Dotta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2017173139843592456

 

[Dotta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2017308020703662572

 

[Dotta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2017365835283681383

 

[JennieM]

Disturbing new images released as part of last night's Epstein files appear to show Andrew Mountbatten Windsor crouching on all fours over a female lying on the floor

In the three images, a man who appears to be the former Prince, can be seen crouching over the person who is sprawled face up with their arms spread out

It is unclear where the images where taken and no further context is given

​

Disturbing photos appear to show Andrew on all fours over female

In the three photographs, a man believed to be Andrew can be seen leaning over the woman who is sprawled face up with their arms spread out.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[Luna20]

Disturbing new images released as part of last night's Epstein files appear to show Andrew Mountbatten Windsor crouching on all fours over a female lying on the floor

In the three images, a man who appears to be the former Prince, can be seen crouching over the person who is sprawled face up with their arms spread out

It is unclear where the images where taken and no further context is given

​

Disturbing photos appear to show Andrew on all fours over female

In the three photographs, a man believed to be Andrew can be seen leaning over the woman who is sprawled face up with their arms spread out.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Gross. Towels on the table and it looks like Epsteins feet. He seemed to have a foot fetish.

 

[JDG]

Epsteins feet??

How do you know?

Three fully dressed adults together in a room.

The ‘Russian’ girl was 26 and she was to have dinner with the Prince.

Yes, truly gross. Not.

Just another nothing burger from the Daily Fail.

 

[303gmf]

Andrew certainly was not the only high profile name connected to Epstein yet he has been the only one to have been named and continually in the press. He has had everything he valued removed and it has been recorded that people are concerned about his mental health.
Every one seems to extol mental health but ignores it when it does not fit their agenda.

Agenda?

What was his ?
Young girls, ick

His own fault

 

[JDG]

Agenda?

What was his ?
Young girls, ick

His own fault

Please define ‘young girls’.

If you mean children, he has never been accused of any form of child abuse.

If you mean young women of legal age, they are adults and able to give consent.

My understanding is that Prince Andrew was involved with many young women.

Not a crime, not a perversion.

 

[Dotta]

Just another nothing burger from the Daily Fail.

Google is full of articles about the matter.
American, Australian and many more.
In fact,
Press/Media ALL OVER THE WORLD
have a field day with new E.'s files revelations.

<modsnip>

JMO

 

[JDG]

Google is full of articles about the matter.
American, Australian and many more.
In fact,
Press/Media ALL OVER THE WORLD
have a field day with new E. revelations.

Oh, by the way,
DM name is "Mail"
No need to go ballistic and offensive towards MSM whose job is to report things.

JMO

Thank you.

You’ve just proven my point.

This is a media pile on against Prince Andrew (AMW).

Media driven anti Monarchist nonsense. IMO, MOO

 

[Luna20]

@JDG

I’m referring to the photo in Epsteins private plane of his bare feet inside Maxwells bra. She has her hands on his feet.

 

[JDG]

@JDG

I’m referring to the photo in Epsteins private plane of his bare feet inside Maxwells bra. She has her hands on his feet.

Oh, my apologies.

Your comment about towels, tables and feet seemed to indicate the picture of a person sitting with their feet up on a table.

I wondered how you could identify someone from their bare feet.

I have not seen any picture as you’ve described.

 

[Luna20]

Oh, my apologies.

Your comment about towels, tables and feet seemed to indicate the picture of a person sitting with their feet up on a table.

I wondered how you could identify someone from their bare feet.

I have not seen any picture as you’ve described.

No worries. I didn’t elaborate and should have. I will see if I can find the photo. He has his legs stretched out like the above picture.

 

[Luna20]