UK - (Former prince) Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor accused of underage sexual relationship, 1999-2002 *settled* #2

  • #1,501

Lord Mandelson fed information from Number Ten to Epstein for financial gain/sensitive information.

Mandelson got £75,000 in return, sent to his now husband.

Lord Peter Mandelson is pictured in his underpants with a woman in a robe beside him.

Lord Peter Mandelson should definitely be in jail. IMO, MOO etc.

He’s a pal, a great pal to PM Starmer.
Lord Mandelson is openly gay, so that is a puzzler.
 
  • #1,502
Lord Mandelson is openly gay, so that is a puzzler.
Perhaps to give the excuse "The girls/women were only providing massages! See - even Mandelson got one. Nothing more than massages."

IDK. Trying to make sense of corrupt elites is likely futile.

jmo
 
  • #1,503
  • #1,504
Lord Mandelson is openly gay, so that is a puzzler.

Could be bi.

The main point is what he has done passing information to E.

The woman looks similar to MM. Very interesting. 🤔
 
  • #1,505
  • #1,506
Perhaps to give the excuse "The girls/women were only providing massages! See - even Mandelson got one. Nothing more than massages."

IDK. Trying to make sense of corrupt elites is likely futile.

jmo

Why the robe for her then?
 
  • #1,507
  • #1,508
I meant that although other of Philip's descendants have Mountbatten as part of their names (eg Archie and Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor), most people probably don't know or care about that. And never knew or have forgotten what Philip's surname was. But with Andrew and his name now in an intense spotlight, pretty much everybody has heard the name "Mountbatten". And Andrew has brought shame upon it.

The Mountbatten name has been notorious for years.

Louis Mountbatten brought shame to the name while the last Viceroy of India & due to his own scandals.
 
  • #1,509
Why the robe for her then?
I have no idea. Not my crowd, lol.

My question returns to: who took the photo? Who took any of the photos in the files that look so boring and mundane yet are compromising?

jmo
 
  • #1,510
I have no idea. Not my crowd, lol.

My question returns to: who took the photo? Who took any of the photos in the files that look so boring and mundane yet are compromising?

jmo

It has been suggested that there were cameras everywhere in the homes.

All the better to blackmail the visitors.

I mean who walks around someone else’s house in their underpants?
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
220
Guests online
1,873
Total visitors
2,093

Forum statistics

Threads
639,442
Messages
18,742,960
Members
244,658
Latest member
Granny007
Back
Top