I would never give a name up, no matter what unless the cops could prove it with DNA & of course a body. I don't ever think anybody should be convicted for murder on circumstantial. It's a violation of true justice. Does that mean that a killer goes free, yes but rather that then an innocent person in jail. That neighbour is innocent until proven guilty. He might be some other criminal who did something stupid & that's why he burned the van but it can't lead to him being jailed for murder. That's simply not justice.
Found Deceased UK - Graham Wright, missing 8/25/25, Glasgow *human remains' found in Loch Lomond*
- Thread starter ZeroAlpha
- Start date
Yeah but they must not have enough, for example you know the guy in rutherglen has turned for the prosecution, so he must be saying what he knows/believes etc, and police are acting on this ? Because if he is saying he murdered him that’s the charge they would go for?
It's probably friends & acquaintances of acquaintances they are following. They are literally going from house to house to find something. I don't think the Mcginty guy knows anything besides that he is a friend of a friend of somebody that knows somebody else. That's what the police did act on. They did really act, the last was a downstairs female neighbor with a love triangle & houses of that woman's friends. But if nothing is found....Don't forget if it hadn't been for those few parts washing at Loch Lomond there would be nada. Zilch, You would have 2 people who just disappeared in thin air. Whether they are connected or not, a person who operates like that, who can make that happen, is not the 1 you would easily find . Remember it's the idiots who get caught.
Cause that female was the downstairs neighbour of Graham in the Gorbals. https://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/news/15403493/murder-police-graham-wright-death-loch-lomond/
That's what also led them to Castlemilk. They really are trying but if Graham would have been killed by a stranger, then nothing what the cops do will ever uncover that this way. But that's nobody's fault. That's just bad bad luck.
That's what also led them to Castlemilk. They really are trying but if Graham would have been killed by a stranger, then nothing what the cops do will ever uncover that this way. But that's nobody's fault. That's just bad bad luck.
They are going to end all the way to Galloway forest at this rate. Old golf course taped off by cops after body of Rangers fan found in Loch Lomond
So soon they will go searching all over Cathkin Braes Country Park probably. They would never do all this if they didn't think it was murder. They just can't prove it nor who did it. But I wouldn't necessarily think that if you go to Loch Lomond to dispose of hands or feet or arms, then you will go put the head somewhere in Castlemilk. You would go somewhere else if you are smart.
Well strangely the William begs limbs in the loch documentary was on Scottish television in early September
They say they maybe found something substantial so maybe they can now see if it was murder. It would be a bit uncomfortable if it turned out it was no foul play at all. Maybe they got really lucky & some DNA or fibers or something.
Watched that last year when it first came out. Limbs in the Loch: Catching a Killer was a good documentary. A family member was involved in that case. They told me a few disturbing things.
Serononin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2025
- Messages
- 313
- Reaction score
- 2,892
<modsnip: Quoted post was removed>The head isn't necessarily the only other possibility. A stab wound to the leg, for instance, could be fatal if it hit the femoral artery (I can't remember if Graham's limbs have been recovered or not?)
Last edited by a moderator:
The loch wasn't searched any longer but police was put there to watch the crime scene. I don't know if that is still the case. I guess they thought the killer might come back....
A hand was found, no other limbs that they have said. Not many murderers go for the leg I think. But it's certainly true. That's why it so imperative to find an entire body.
A hand was found, no other limbs that they have said. Not many murderers go for the leg I think. But it's certainly true. That's why it so imperative to find an entire body.
The4TierBridge
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2025
- Messages
- 677
- Reaction score
- 2,394
DNA evidence IS a kind of circumstantial evidence, not direct evidence.
Itz_CrimsonYT
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2025
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 210
Was he wearing anything when he was located? And how decomposed was he?
The4TierBridge
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2025
- Messages
- 677
- Reaction score
- 2,394
<modsnip: Quoted post was removed> ... All it would prove is that you were in the vicinity of somebody or that you or something you had touched had touched them somehow. Same with fingerprints and a lot of other forensic testing (this doesn't mean they aren't strong or definitive though).
Direct evidence is things like eyewitness testimony and audio/video recordings that directly prove something without need for inference.
Last edited by a moderator:
How do you know a hand was found?
the police is calling again for Lewis from their SM police page. It's such a sad state of affairs.
nousernameimagination
Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2025
- Messages
- 7
- Reaction score
- 38
That blows my Theory then, and puts question marks on the link between the two cases
trying to put pressure on his friend probably, no mention of charge? Assisting on offender stuff ?Now a 50 year old has been arrested
Similar threads
