UK UK- Janet Brown, 51, research nurse, found nude, gagged, handcuffed & bludgeoned to death, @ home, Buckinghamshire,10 April '95, *DNA, new initiative*

  • #501
IMO, if they weren't lying in a prominent position such as the hall table, where the husband would have seen them the last time he was there, how would a home invader know about them, look for them, or find them?

I find it a strange comment by the husband. Was he suggesting his wife got out the handcuffs to play master/slave with someone, when he wasn't home?

I was wondering if the handcuffs were in Janet's jewellery box or in a drawer of her dressing table. The killer makes Janet put on jewellery so perhaps he spots the handcuffs?

It is a very strange comment though. Why didn't he ask about them when he first saw them years earlier?

The master/slave scenario is very interesting. Handcuffs weren't unusual amongst consenting couples, but the husband doesn't know why they might have been there.
 
  • #502
I was wondering if the handcuffs were in Janet's jewellery box or in a drawer of her dressing table. The killer makes Janet put on jewellery so perhaps he spots the handcuffs?

It is a very strange comment though. Why didn't he ask about them when he first saw them years earlier?

The master/slave scenario is very interesting. Handcuffs weren't unusual amongst consenting couples, but the husband doesn't know why they might have been there.
Yes, however I personally can't imagine a 50 year old woman keeping a random, useless pair of handcuffs with her jewelry or underwear. Any more than she'd keep duct tape, an old hammer or a knife...You want to have pretty things in the places where you keep your pretty things. And your female children will definitely go look through your jewelry box, normally with your permission.

I interpreted the husband's comment as indicating that once upon a time they used the handcuffs as a couple. Why else would anyone own them? To tie up burglars you've captured - or discipline the children when they were younger? (irony).
 
  • #503
I too find the husband's comment(s) about the handcuffs strange. Is there an exact quote of what he said somewhere?
 
  • #504
I think the husband most likely made that comment because he was to embarrassed to say he and his wife used them which is understandable but he didn't want to throw off the investigation by not admitting they was his wife's handcuffs so he had to say something.
 
  • #505
If he smashed his way into the house, then why didn't the forensic team find any tiny glass fragments on the piece of carpet they examined?

Could the piece of carpet have been too far away from the patio for the glass to carry?
That I find incredible is that on that piece of carpet they did not find any broken glass fragments . Trust me when you take broken or smashed glass it lands metres away and even after hoovering up really thorough you still find it after you have finished hoovering . This case actually burns my mind . Every time I think of an answer there seems to be something to counter weigh my answer lol .
 
  • #506
That I find incredible is that on that piece of carpet they did not find any broken glass fragments . Trust me when you take broken or smashed glass it lands metres away and even after hoovering up really thorough you still find it after you have finished hoovering . This case actually burns my mind . Every time I think of an answer there seems to be something to counter weigh my answer lol .
Sescsteve,

Did you see my question for you? What do you think was the purpose of the tape that the intruder stuck on the glass please?

Thanks.
 
  • #507
Sescsteve,

Did you see my question for you? What do you think was the purpose of the tape that the intruder stuck on the glass please?

Thanks.
It really is a difficult one to be honest . I assume it was used to stick to the glass to keep the glass together when cutting but as I said before to cut glass with tape over the top is just not ideal so maybe someone thought it would be easy after seeing them old films where you see the intruder just score the glass and pull the glass out lol 6mm glass would be very very difficult.
 
  • #508
I too find the husband's comment(s) about the handcuffs strange. Is there an exact quote of what he said somewhere?
IIRC it was mentioned in one of Paul Britton's books, but there weren't any direct quotes.
 
  • #509
The husband must have known if he and Janet had used handcuffs in the past. If they had not used them, but they had already been in the house before the home invasion, when the husband first saw them, he would have asked Janet what she was doing with them. That would have been a memorable conversation. What possible reason could there have been for Janet to have had them, apart from kinky play? The husband would have asked with whom she had been "playing".

Perhaps the police resolved this, but, they would not have said publicly if Janet and her husband had been into kinky stuff. If Janet had been involved with someone she had met from, say, a contact magazine, they might release that information, but they might not.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
134
Guests online
3,344
Total visitors
3,478

Forum statistics

Threads
632,119
Messages
18,622,372
Members
243,027
Latest member
Richard Morris
Back
Top