otto
Verified Expert (numerous designations)
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 42,454
- Reaction score
- 122,464
I posted this in the previous thread:
Originally Posted by slug
just been looking over some timelines of this case and the one here
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12109085
"makes it look like she left the pub went into waitrose then went home before going out again to tesco and bargin booze.
This new timeline makes more sense to me than the original, which seemed to me to give her too much time to get home, even allowing for the shopping stops. I guess she would be a brisk walker.
It now seems certain that the cider and pizza were bought to feed a visitor, who contacted her after she got home (maybe actually waiting for when she arrived?)."
The general consensus was that the BBC timeline was just badly worded. I'm not so sure.
Why were keys and phone at home if she went out again? How could she go out without her keys?