- Joined
- Sep 12, 2023
- Messages
- 169
- Reaction score
- 356
"I haven't seen that one to know if that one goes in to any more detail? If anyone has come across anything that concentrates on the details of the murder itself I'd like the details please. Just seems there are lots of questions to be answered but no one wants to ask them."
I've seen it. It's disappointing, in my view, in respect of the investigation into how he was killed, by whom and why. It's basically an account of Palmer's life and crimes. Predictable stuff, really. It didn't seem add anything to what is already known.
There are so many unanswered questions. One theory is that Palmer was negotiating with authorities in Spain on a possible reduced sentence for his crimes there. Another is that he had something incriminating in a Hatton Garden deposit box which was stolen in the heist. Yet another I've come across is that he was paying protection money to some brothers and fell into arrears.
I've read quite a bit about him but details of the investigation into his death seem thin on the ground. I don't think it's even been fully established what surgery he'd had - some sources say heart, some say gallbladder.
The big question for me (and I'm sure others are thinking the same) is: who knew enough about his movements to catch him in the only part of the garden where there was no security camera? He was in the habit (so I've read) of making calls in that part of the garden for privacy. He was paranoid about safety. How did his son not realise he'd been shot? Why were the dogs not patrolling the garden?
I've seen it. It's disappointing, in my view, in respect of the investigation into how he was killed, by whom and why. It's basically an account of Palmer's life and crimes. Predictable stuff, really. It didn't seem add anything to what is already known.
There are so many unanswered questions. One theory is that Palmer was negotiating with authorities in Spain on a possible reduced sentence for his crimes there. Another is that he had something incriminating in a Hatton Garden deposit box which was stolen in the heist. Yet another I've come across is that he was paying protection money to some brothers and fell into arrears.
I've read quite a bit about him but details of the investigation into his death seem thin on the ground. I don't think it's even been fully established what surgery he'd had - some sources say heart, some say gallbladder.
The big question for me (and I'm sure others are thinking the same) is: who knew enough about his movements to catch him in the only part of the garden where there was no security camera? He was in the habit (so I've read) of making calls in that part of the garden for privacy. He was paranoid about safety. How did his son not realise he'd been shot? Why were the dogs not patrolling the garden?