- Joined
- Nov 30, 2013
- Messages
- 13,432
- Reaction score
- 65,718
I just meant the wording, I don’t recall the police using Haworth St in their description of the location before.
Oh I see. It's just to pinpoint where the bench is, I think
I just meant the wording, I don’t recall the police using Haworth St in their description of the location before.
I looked at it.
But as a lot of it in polish only had a quick glance.
I had meant to ask a polish guy I know what he thought of it but it was gone by the time I saw him.
yes I wondered this too. If they have LS sitting on the bench and assuming it’s a static camera (apologies if this has already been discussed) would they not have an image of whoever was walking back to the parked car in Haworth or even the possible LS being walked or carried to the car?Apologies if this has been asked before - would cctv have caught her on the bench there? If so, I wonder why they haven't released that to the public?
There isn't now! Originally the footage was really grainy and so it wasn't that clear if she appeared drunk at all. But the daily.mail updated it where it's clearer and she does look drunk in the footage since it's clearer and has been extendedIs there any point to over analysing her drunken state? We know she'd been drinking. She seemingly vanished out of thin air so how that happened is the relevant puzzle in my opinion.
Whether she was steaming drunk or just a bit tipsy, she was alone and vulnerable.
As for the search in the scrubland, maybe they are looking for possessions or a weapon. Cutting the brambles would make that easier.
To me it reads as them basically confirming the Haworth St footage is Libby, without explicitly saying so.Oh I see. It's just to pinpoint where the bench is, I think
yes I wondered this too. If they have LS sitting on the bench and assuming it’s a static camera (apologies if this has already been discussed) would they not have an image of whoever was walking back to the parked car in Haworth or even the possible LS being walked or carried to the car?
The camera I assume they have seen her on is situated at the cross road junction of Beverley Road and Cottingham/Clough Rd. It is a police erected camera that can be moved to focus on any target 360°
There isn't now! Originally the footage was really grainy and so it wasn't that clear if she appeared drunk at all. But the daily.mail updated it where it's clearer and she does look drunk in the footage since it's clearer and has been extended
Ok - I am a first time poster here but have been lurking for months and this case has really got me hooked because I have daughters the same age and it is so confusing.
In order for the police to arrest PR they must know information they are not sharing and also the same goes for them searching the park as much as they are doing.
I have watched the CCTV spiderweb footage so many times on slow speed and it certainly looks like a female with long hair gets into the passenger side of the car before he drives off, but the car looks different to the one they took away from PR’s house. How can we be certain that car has anything to do with this? The police say she was not seen since the bench and they haven’t mentioned anything about her in a car, so is that all part of the information they are holding back? And why haven’t they asked for the car people and the cyclist to come forward because they might have seen something being so near the bench around the corner or am I missing something here?
I'm so sorry about your daughter Chris. Thank you for the information.My daughter died suddenly last April and wasn't found for 8 hours despite me being in the house. I assumed she'd left and didn't see her under her duvet on the floor. Was texting and trying to ring her all afternoon so the cops took both her phone and mine. Later the Coroner's officer told me they needn't have even taken mine as they could have got everything, even the texts, from my provider within a few days.
Ok - I am a first time poster here but have been lurking for months and this case has really got me hooked because I have daughters the same age and it is so confusing.
In order for the police to arrest PR they must know information they are not sharing and also the same goes for them searching the park as much as they are doing.
I have watched the CCTV spiderweb footage so many times on slow speed and it certainly looks like a female with long hair gets into the passenger side of the car before he drives off, but the car looks different to the one they took away from PR’s house. How can we be certain that car has anything to do with this? The police say she was not seen since the bench and they haven’t mentioned anything about her in a car, so is that all part of the information they are holding back? And why haven’t they asked for the car people and the cyclist to come forward because they might have seen something being so near the bench around the corner or am I missing something here?