- Joined
- Aug 19, 2012
- Messages
- 14,024
- Reaction score
- 61,203
Would we hear what the note said?
Not right now, but probably after the verdict it will be reported what they asked.
Would we hear what the note said?
Thank you!Not right now, but probably after the verdict it will be reported what they asked.
20 years ago when my kids were little I worked for a college that did outreach in a local mental health resource centre. So I'd go there once a week to teach basic maths. One girl, who was very bright, just stopped coming so I went to her key social worker who told me she'd been raped at a party and was upset.I agree that I don’t know how else the mental health could be discussed differently for Libby’s case, but it just feels it should have been.
Completely agree. Long story short; I suffered from depression whilst at Uni, and once told my dad I’d throw myself into the River Orwell during an argument...if any of the men that were ‘pesting’ me ever attacked me and threw me into that river then would a defending QC be all over my records and build a defence for a murderer based on something I was going through and said 20 years ago? It was the part of Libby’s personal struggle, that she was clearly working on coming through the other side of, that was used against her to excuse a vile man (that had already offended and terrified/ruined the lives of other women) that made my blood boil and write my first message on here.
When I say survival mode I am relying on an expert witness who has estimated her body temperature has dropped to 35 degrees and therefore she is hypothermic.
So her body will be focused on preventing further drops in temperature. Human beings function within a very narrow range of a lot of things like body temp and work very hard to remain within that range.
When she left the taxi she was already very drunk. But it is unlikely she had spent enough time in the cold at that point for a significant drop in body temp. So it would be easier to walk along pavements
When PR picks her up the expert has stated he believes she is now hypothermic with a body temp of 35. Her body will have been working flat out to preserve it - breaking down glycogen, shivering, diverting its resources to that
The park is not a flat pavement.
So you're not really comparing like with like.
That’s just awful. System absolutely has to change. Somehow. Not sure how. Jmo20 years ago when my kids were little I worked for a college that did outreach in a local mental health resource centre. So I'd go there once a week to teach basic maths. One girl, who was very bright, just stopped coming so I went to her key social worker who told me she'd been raped at a party and was upset.
The key worker told me that he and her psychiatric nurse and the police all believed her. He also told me it had not a bat in hells chance of getting to court. Her health records and the fact she'd been seen with him meant it wasn't going to happen.
No wonder so many people are still afraid to access mental health services if it can still be held against a person in this way. Let's hope there has been some progress in 20 years though I doubt it.20 years ago when my kids were little I worked for a college that did outreach in a local mental health resource centre. So I'd go there once a week to teach basic maths. One girl, who was very bright, just stopped coming so I went to her key social worker who told me she'd been raped at a party and was upset.
The key worker told me that he and her psychiatric nurse and the police all believed her. He also told me it had not a bat in hells chance of getting to court. Her health records and the fact she'd been seen with him meant it wasn't going to happen.
Well then we're split aren't we. I must admit I don't understand the issue. 700 metres is not that far.Bbm
I see you repeting this like the river not being tidal. With all respect two locals said they didn't have issue with the timing in response to me saying many indeed did.
There were a lot of locals before who said they did have issues and perhaps 1 or 2 since have also said they do, so that definitely seems a matter of opinion.
Moo
Not deliberately thoIf you watch the CCTV she almost did
He outlined what state she would be in from the jury. He estimated her body temp at 35. He said she would be tired, uncoordinated etc. He estimated how long he thought she'd be like that.Can you send me the link to the part when the expert witness said she was in survival mode please? and the reference to drops in glycogen and diverting resources? I didn’t see that so would be interested to re read it if I’ve missed it.
I've a horrible feeling the mental health stuff was also a nod to the rape charge as in this girl is crazy who knows what she'd consent to.I honestly think the suicide theory is going to go down like a ton of bricks with the jury and make them less likely to acquit rather than more. They are being asked to consider as reasonably possible that PR leaves Libby in the road and she decides to find a river and jump in. In my opinion it's absolutely bonkers and look's a bit desperate. I don't have a problem with them raising it but I think going into overkill on it was a mistake. I'm baffled why the defence banged on about it for so long instead of spending much more time promoting their much better misadventure argument and generally casting doubt on all the other issues like timings, the screams, the mystery man in the park etc.
If their plan was to hint a wink to the jury that PR may well have left her distressed not in the road but rather more proximate to the river, I might agree suicide wasnt impossible. But as the defendant's evidence is the total opposite of that they are asking a lot from me to even be willing to go down that route. And if I thought thats what they were doing and PR was lying I'd probably infer he was trying to hide something, ask myself what that might be, and the obvious answer would be he'd killed her.
Interesting article. Particularly the part where it says PR was given 'an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order'. I'm going to Google what that is, now.Interesting read. Judge describes him as a very dangerous individual!
Man jailed for spying on young women having sex and walking around homes in underwear
Yes he did. I'm not sure the jury would have been told that bit tho. Even tho it is as relevant as Libby's mental healthInteresting read. Judge describes him as a very dangerous individual!
Man jailed for spying on young women having sex and walking around homes in underwear
Interesting article. Particularly the part where it says PR was given 'an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order'. I'm going to Google what that is, now.
What is a Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) | Wells Burcombe LLPSO,...if PR is found guilty of rape, breaching his SHPO can carry up to a maximum sentence of 5 years for this breach alone?Interesting article. Particularly the part where it says PR was given 'an indefinite Sexual Harm Prevention Order'. I'm going to Google what that is, now.