Sorry didn't mean to shout!lolTHAT'S what I thought.
Sorry didn't mean to shout!lolTHAT'S what I thought.
Sorry didn't mean to shout!lol
Not sure if this link has been posted, could be what you said or God knows what else.Do you think this would be Libby or more deviancy charges? If he’s been charged with those 4 already I’d imagine they have evidence already for those ones? Any thoughts?
At the very light end of the offence scale.
Whats the difference? Forced entry or not its still burglaryI may be wrong, but wouldn't that mean the burglary didn't involve forced entry? Like he just took advantage of an unlocked door, rather than breaking in.
If there were no difference it wouldn't be distinguished in law.Whats the difference? Forced entry or not its still burglary
I already like Linda, she’s my kind of woman. Out with the dog having a nose.
Whats the difference? Forced entry or not its still burglary
Whats the difference? Forced entry or not its still burglary
I’m going to need a clue I’m afraid...sorry.What's John holding?
What's John holding?
Without any further information it's impossible to work out if he targeted his victims or if it was just pure chance.Sentencing guidelines detail a category 1 offence ( most serious) as one causing 'greater harm and higher culpability'
https://www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Burglary_Definitive_Guideline_web_final.pdf
Factors indicating greater harm include; Soiling or ransacking property , occupier at home or returns home,
Factors indicating greater higher culpability include; Victim deliberately targeted due to a vulnerability based on sexual orientation, race etc. - A significant degree of planning or organisation.
I would say based on what he allegedly did inside one home the crime would meet the guideline for greater harm. We don't know if he tried to be seen by the occupiers or not but it's possible.
I would argue he did select victims deliberately based on vulnerablity, and he quite likely planned them which would mean his crime could count as a category 1 offence. Sentence range 2-6 years.
I'm not saying he would get all that time, could have some suspended but to me (I'm not an expert at all ), from the guidelines it does look like the more serious end of the burglary scale.
Sorry not trying to contradict you but it isn't, it's the correct term.It's unusual for them to use the term trespass
It would largely depend on the purpose for the search but considering that he has only been charged with offences not directly linked to LS disappearing I would say that they would cover their arses and get one.Would LE need another search warrant to go back into his property and if so would they have needed new evidence to get a new one?
What's John holding?
Sorry not trying to contradict you but it isn't, it's the correct term.
Of course there's a difference. Forced entry involves criminal damage, and usually leaves the victim with their property insecure and damage to be repaired. That adds to the worry and distress.Whats the difference? Forced entry or not its still burglary