Found Deceased UK - Lindsay Birbeck, 47, Accrington, 12 Aug 2019 *Arrest* #3

[Ann Blyth]

Being deliberately vague is certainly not a solid defence, but maybe when coupled with his moderate learning difficulties, the jury would fail to find him guilty of murder, after all they have to be sure beyond reasonable doubt, and it could be that the far fetched story and his learning difficulties together are enough to prevent the jury coming to a verdict. IMO

 

[Legally Bland]

Just to clarify. When people here are referring to 'path between the bungalows' are you referring to the one between 354 and 356 Burnley Road?

I think it's between 330/332 ish.

خرائط ‪Google‬‏‏

 

[Kaykedi]

Just to clarify. When people here are referring to 'path between the bungalows' are you referring to the one between 354 and 356 Burnley Road?

Can you see the bungalow with the manicured garden? Mushroom shaped greenery? That's the path that you see the defendant walking down in the dark

 

[Kaykedi]

Can you see the bungalow with the manicured garden? Mushroom shaped greenery? That's the path that you see the defendant walking down in the dark

It looks like you can cut through numbers 354 and 356 but I've never done that myself

 

[Doris777]

Lindsay Birbeck murder trial: Every piece of evidence heard in week one

Run down from the whole week

 

[sunflower22]

What’s everyone’s views so far? Guilty or not guilty of murder.

 

[Bampot]

Guilty.

 

[sunflower22]

Guilty.

Do you think they will have more evidence? At the minute the evidence they’ve got is only linking him to the removal of LB.

 

[MusicalMonkey]

Guilty.

I'm not buying this 'moderate learning difficulties' excuse either. He's shown that he's been very calculated in the way he went to great lengths to hide the body and seemingly did it pretty well (so that even a trained sniffer dog couldn't find it from just 6 metres away). Also 'dry runs', seemingly following the case from home and changing routes according to CCTV footage etc.

The Hooded Man story is ludicrous in the extreme.

Though I do take on board there could be elements of doubt in some areas, but there nearly always is. Can anyone provide me with 100% proof that Werewolves don't exist?

 

[Bampot]

Aye I think they will have more evidence. We know his home was searched and items seized including a knife and clothing. Lots more to come. I hope he takes to the stand.

 

[sunflower22]

Aye I think they will have more evidence. We know his home was searched and items seized including a knife and clothing. Lots more to come. I hope he takes to the stand.

where does it state clothing was seized? I know about the knife and the plastic sheeting.

 

[MusicalMonkey]

I think it's between 330/332 ish.

خرائط ‪Google‬‏‏

Ah. It's the same path that links up.

 

[sunflower22]

Guilty.

I'm not buying this 'moderate learning difficulties' excuse either. He's shown that he's been very calculated in the way he went to great lengths to hide the body and seemingly did it pretty well (so that even a trained sniffer dog couldn't find it from just 6 metres away). Also 'dry runs', seemingly following the case from home and changing routes according to CCTV footage etc.

The Hooded Man story is ludicrous in the extreme.

Though I do take on board there could be elements of doubt in some areas, but there nearly always is. Can anyone provide me with 100% proof that Werewolves don't exist?

I still don’t understand why a trained sniffer dog didn’t find anything yet a normal dog did? Doesn’t make sense. And if the boy had any sense I think he should of just left the body where it was, Surley he’s not that clever to think he wouldn’t get caught on a busy main road where CCTV is

 

[Kaykedi]

Ah. It's the same path that links up.

Haha! Did you manage to get a good look around it on street view?

 

[Kaykedi]

I still don’t understand why a trained sniffer dog didn’t find anything yet a normal dog did? Doesn’t make sense. And if the boy had any sense I think he should of just left the body where it was, Surley he’s not that clever to think he wouldn’t get caught on a busy main road where CCTV is

Someone mentioned the police dog wasn't let off the lead to have a good scout around on it's own whereas the regular dog was (the doggy that found Lindsay)

 

[MusicalMonkey]

Haha! Did you manage to get a good look around it on street view?

I actually forgot I had Google Earth, so I've just started using that.

It can go the places The Google Car hasn't. Such as Plantation Road (Accrington Bypass side of The Coppice).

 

[Kaykedi]

Someone mentioned the police dog wasn't let off the lead to have a good scout around on it's own whereas the regular dog was (the doggy that found Lindsay)

If Lindsay was being stored in one of the outhouses at the back of Burnley Road (as is speculated by some peeps), is it possible he didn't leave her body there due to 'too much' dna that he wanted to get rid of? I'm trying to say, did he get her out of that building in order to clean it thoroughly?

 

[Kaykedi]

I actually forgot I had Google Earth, so I've just started using that.

It can go the places The Google Car hasn't. Such as Plantation Road (Accrington Bypass side of The Coppice).

Brill

 

[Bampot]

where does it state clothing was seized? I know about the knife and the plastic sheeting.

Mr McLachlan said a search of the defendants home in Accrington recovered clothing which matched what he was wearing on CCTV clips from August 12, 16 and 17.

Lindsay Birbeck murder trial: Every piece of evidence heard in week one

 

[sunflower22]

Someone mentioned the police dog wasn't let off the lead to have a good scout around on it's own whereas the regular dog was (the doggy that found Lindsay)

With such a high risk case, and everyone out looking for her then you would of thought that the dog would of been let of lead especially that there is a lot of woodland areas that was getting searched. Not sure how good these trained dogs are but 6m isn’t that far. Very strange I think