GUILTY UK - Luton - Nicholas Prosper charged with murder of Mother, Brother and Sister at their home. Plus weapons charges for shotgun & knife (13 Sep '24)

This live report is such a hard read - his poor family must have suffered so much, and the neighbour who heard the attack, and the parents, teachers and pupils at the school where he planned the attack- awful
 

Gun seller was thanked by Prosper for his assistancepublished at 12:12
12:12


Prosper went on to tweak his forged shotgun certificate, using the signature of a sergeant in Bedfordshire Police's firearms unit.

He messaged another seller on 30 August, who was advertising a shotgun online for £450. Prosper offered to pay him £600 if cartridges were included, Cray says.

Prosper told him "he was a serious buyer and would be able to travel down" to where the seller lived to pay for it, cash in hand.

In a message to the seller, Prosper wrote: "Thank you for your corporation, [Sic] and please, since you’re the one making the journey, do be honest as I’d hate to make things more difficult for you."

The seller agreed to meet him on 12 September, with Prosper replying: "Sounds great! I’ve been investing so I wouldn’t mind throwing in some extra gas money as thanks."

I've got about a million questions for this guy who sold him the shotgun. OK, so the certificate may have been a very convincing forgery, but his customer is a teenager living with his mum and siblings in a high rise apartment block in Luton who wants to complete the transaction using cash in a car park like some shady drug deal?!

I'm sure there are some red flags there which could and should have been picked up!

 

Judge adjourns sentencing to consider prison termpublished at 15:02
15:02​


Mrs Justice Cheema-Grubb says she will not be passing sentence today.

Instead, the judge says she needs time to consider all the factors put before her.

She tells the court her sentencing remarks will begin at 10:30 GMT on Wednesday.
 
He's refused to enter the dock, but the judge has delayed sentence till he has been brought there.

 
Last edited:
I can't see it ever being safe to release him. I hope he doesn't take the easy way out by suicide. Nicholas Prosper will be a marked man, forever looking over his shoulder. I doubt he will survive to 2074.
 
Is that 49 years a firm sentence, or will he walk free in ten years or so?
He needs to go away as long as possible.
 
How many legitimate firearms sales in the UK take place in... a car park?!
Sorry, coming to this late as I've only just heard of it the other day - I can offer an insight into this as I'm a Registered Firearms Dealer.

A good question!

Yes, firearms sales/transfers do take place in car parks, as well as various other places, from time to time. I've done it. It'll only ever be a minority of sales that take place that way, though.

If you're a private individual it actually makes a lot of sense to do something like this in a public space as many people see it as a security risk to be visiting the home of a stranger with a firearm or have a stranger turn up to your house which contains firearms.

A private individual can sell a firearm he owns to another individual on production of that person's shotgun cert or firearm cert. These are paper with the holder's details on including their photo. The seller checks the purchaser's details and as long as everything seems legit there's no reason not to sell to them.

As regards a shotgun certificate, the certificate authorises the holder to purchase as many shotguns and as much ammunition as they like. A Firearm Certificate authorises the purchase of the guns listed on the certificate (by type and calibre, usually) and allows possession of maximum amounts of ammunition. That's the simplified version, anyway.

I've long considered the physical certificate to be a security hole because if you lose it and it gets into the hands of someone else then they have access to all your details; full name, DoB, address, and a list of all the firearms you possess. In this day and age there is no reason not to have it as a plastic card with only a barcode on that you can use to access the holder's details which will give you details of what they're authorised to acquire.

The PCC, Tizard, I think he was named as really should have checked the situation before spouting forth about changes to the system. He's calling for a national database of certificate holders - there already is it's called the National Firearms Licensing Management System! He makes a reasonable point in saying that it should be checkable by a seller, though. The system we have today is one of paper certificates, however, which act as the acquisition authorities.

Interestingly, I can state with 100% certainty that not even on-duty police officers can directly access NFLMS and need to contact the relevant force's licensing section to check specific details of a certificate holder's certificate which they can only do during office hours. An individual's personal record on the PNC will show them as a certificate holder but not what firearms they are entitled to be in possession of.

On the subject of the seller of this gun; there is a provision on certificates that requires a party to a transaction to report to the police anything which appears to be improper or concerning about a transaction - I'll get the specific wording from my certs later.

We don't know the specific details of this transaction so I'm not trying to call out the seller as having done anything wrong. However, speaking as an RFD I think that anyone offering me nearly 50% more for something I had for sale, and petrol money, and sell them ammo, and wanting me to deliver to a car park would raise a flag with me. Individually nothing wrong with any of those points but collectively....??? I'd be asking a lot more questions about the deal, tbh. Again, we don't know the circumstances so it's not easy to comment specifically.

Some articles say that the seller was a firearms dealer, others that it was a private individual. I have to say that I'm amazed that it wasn't made the case years ago that all sales between cert holders had to go through RFD's. Even though an RFD can't check the national database, requiring bother buyer and seller to physically walk into a gunshop with staff who do these transactions every day would be a massive disincentive to the vast majority of people trying a scam like this. Posting firearms directly to cert holders was stopped many years ago.
 
Last edited:
I've got about a million questions for this guy who sold him the shotgun. OK, so the certificate may have been a very convincing forgery, but his customer is a teenager living with his mum and siblings in a high rise apartment block in Luton who wants to complete the transaction using cash in a car park like some shady drug deal?!

I'm sure there are some red flags there which could and should have been picked up!

As my previous, it does happen and there can be good reasons for doing it that way. Like I say above, we don't know the actual specifics so it's difficult to comment in detail. Bottom line is that if someone has a certificate then they've been vetted and authorised by the police and the physical certificate is what a seller has to put his trust in.

Does anyone have any links to pictures of the fake certificate he used? Be interesting to see how convincing it is or isn't.
 
I am surprised this didn't get more publicity tbh. only heard of this recently.
why no wlo?
Same. Very unusual that something like this has only really been reported now.

One of the reports I saw said that he was "cooperative" with police from the outset so maybe a reduction for early guilty plea?
 

Another idiotic, attention seeking MP, imo.

The guy has been given a 49 year minimum! What possible benefit can changing this to a WLO provide to society?

Moreover, he seems to fail to realise that the clue is in name of his appeal - that the sentence must be unduly lenient! Given that the judge gave a full explanation for it and the fact that is was agreed between the prosecution and defence that a very long finite term would suffice, how is he going to make the case that it's "unduly" lenient?

With the justice system literally grinding to a halt and costs skyrocketing, does he really think that this appeal is a sensible use of money and resources? He said:

On Wednesday, the Conservative shadow justice minister, Kieran Mullan, said: "What exactly does someone have to do in this country to be sent away for life? This was the most serious of crimes - including the murder of two children.

Spend five minutes Googling it mate - no shortage of WLO's of late so plenty of people have managed to achieve that lofty goal.

Muppet!
 

So, as this article confirms, it was a private sale and not one by a firearms dealer as other sources have stated.

For, as the Mail can now reveal, had Mr Billingsby not been fooled by his fake certificate, Prosper had planned to stab the innocent father-of-two to death and simply take the £450 shotgun which he'd seen advertised online.


I can't see that there's any blame to be attached to the seller here now that we know more of the details, tbh. Can't imagine what effect it's had on him quite honestly.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
104
Guests online
5,872
Total visitors
5,976

Forum statistics

Threads
621,288
Messages
18,430,219
Members
239,536
Latest member
PuttingtheSickinForensic
Back
Top