11:46BENJAMIN BLOSSE
Accused was 'trying to build a picture that victim was still alive'
The jury is back in court and Mr Pitter is resuming his opening speech.
Mr Pitter is now telling the jury about evidence relating to phones. He says that Mr Majerkiewicz had two phones seized from him, his own phone and Mr Everett's phone.
His own phone had been set up on the Giff Gaff phone network using Mr Everett's details, jurors hear.
Mr Pitter tells the jury: "That was in the months before he was to go on and kill him. A consideration for you will be why he was using Stuart Everett’s details, and whether this was to play any role in why he was to go on to kill him.
"There is some evidence on the part of Stuart Everett having an appreciation of the defendant taking advantage of him not long before his death."
The prosecutor says that Mr Majerkiewicz's phone was ‘broadly on’ throughout this period but it was turned off in the early hours of March 28.
Mr Pitter says: "We say a proper conclusion is that that is not a mere coincidence, but coincides with the conclusion that he had killed Stuart Everett on night of March 27 and into March 28."
Jurors are told that on April 2 the defendant searched online for 'best remover of stain carpet uk'.
Mr Pitter says of Mr Majerkiewicz: "On April 3 there is evidence that he researched the home address of Stuart Everett’s brother in Derby. We say that was so he could send a birthday card to him under the guise of Stuart Everett."
Jurors are told that the defendant’s fingerprint was on the card.
The KC claims the defendant was ‘trying to build that picture that Stuart Everett was still alive’.
11:53KEY EVENT
Messages sent off Mr Everett's phone 'when he was already dead'
Mr Pitter says: "Messages were sent to people including family members, calculated to give the impression that Stuart Everett was still alive. That included exchanges with Stuart’s niece to wish her a happy birthday, but sent in terminology which was not consistent to have been from him.
"That would be correct of course given the message was sent on April 16 when he was already dead. It also included messages to his brother to give the impression that he was in the process of moving to a different address from Worsley Road.
"It also included a video message being sent, in which the defendant can plainly be seen in the reflection on the splash back of a cooker."
The prosecutor claims that Mr Majerkiewicz used Mr Everett's phone to access Mr Everett's ‘financial and personal affairs’ including bank accounts, Paypal accounts, and his Government gateway account.
Mr Pitter said: "He was in effect utilising the accounts of Stuart Everett for his own personal ends, or as if they were his own ends."
He added: "That included, perhaps you may conclude calculatingly, on April 6 paying the landlord rent from Stuart Everett’s bank account and then sending messages from Stuart Everett’s telephone to the landlord, indicating that he had paid the rent.
"That sat with a letter to the landlord indicating an intention to quit the lease. Part of that picture of he, the defendant, painting of Stuart Everett being alive, but moving on.
"Chillingly, given what was to happen to his body, Stuart Everett’s telephone was used to search 'Kersal Dale’ following the discovery on April 22. The defendant also used the telephone to order and book the skip in which items related to the killing were placed."
11:56BENJAMIN BLOSSE
Accused told 'number of important lies' to police under interview
Jurors hear that Mr Majerkiewicz was interviewed by police on April 26.
Prosecutors claim he told a 'number of important lies', saying he knew nothing about the murder or the disposal of body parts, and that the last time he had seen Mr Everett was before Easter when Mr Everett said he was going to see his brother in Derby.
He said that Mr Everett had texted him to say he would not be returning. He said he was planning on leaving the property as he had ‘notice to move’ by May 3.
Mr Pitter said: "He also made reference as part of that lying picture to cover what he had done, that Stuart had indicated that he had had another stroke recently and he had been hospitalised."
Mr Majerkiewicz said that he had called Mr Everett a few days earlier, and denied having access to Mr Everett's accounts or phone.
Mr Pitter said: "When asked if he believed Stuart was safe and well, he stated the following: 'I hope so, all leads need to be checked'. The prosecution say they were, and those leads point to him, the defendant, being responsible for murdering Stuart Everett."
12:00BENJAMIN BLOSSE
'Wealth of evidence' accused murdered Stuart Everett, prosecution say
Concluding his opening speech to the jury, Mr Pitter says: "There is then, the prosecution say, a wealth of evidence upon which you can be sure that he was responsible for the murder of Stuart Everett. You may ask of course, why did he do that, what was behind it?
"Well, the prosecution do not have what was behind it or to prove a motive, and we do not seek to in this case, but there are a number of messages that you will hear in this case and will want to consider.
"They are messages in the build up to the disappearance of Stuart Everett, messages with his partner, that demonstrate a growing sense of frustration with Stuart Everett, and potentially that he had in mind doing something to him.”
Mr Pitter reads out some messages to the jury. Referring to Mr Polchowski, Mr Majerkiewicz allegedly messaged his partner to say: “The



*** heard what I’m planning’.”
Mr Pitter says there was also ‘tension’ over an increase in rent which Mr Everett told Mr Majerkiewicz about, after Mr Everett was told his rent was increasing.
Speaking of the messages, Mr Pitter says: "If that is right, then that is potentially a potent piece of evidence for you to put into the mix.”
His opening speech has now concluded.
WARNING, READERS MAY FIND EVIDENCE IN THIS TRIAL DISTRESSING: Marcin Majerkiewicz denies murdering the 67-year-old
www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk