- Joined
- Oct 4, 2011
- Messages
- 2,689
- Reaction score
- 5,851
I dont like what I am reading on certain FB pages. I think there is more to this case than meets the eye.
Nurse, Before you shout at me, I am not "going there" just sharing my generalistic (is that a word) view which I have shared on other threads also
Oh heck. Is it code? I can't mentally read these things anymore - I've been out of the UK too long.
Sorry deleted that - I'm trying to post the reward poster but it's not working from my Ipad
Just for interest - the listed height of 24 inches for Mikaeel appears to be way off the normal scale for a 3 year old male.
http://www.chartsgraphsdiagrams.com/HealthCharts/growth-2-20-boys.html
I have lost that FB somehow
Too many tabs open, I think
Sent from my SCH-I605 using Tapatalk now Free
Just for interest - the listed height of 24 inches for Mikaeel appears to be way off the normal scale for a 3 year old male.
http://www.chartsgraphsdiagrams.com/HealthCharts/growth-2-20-boys.html
I dont like what I am reading on certain FB pages. I think there is more to this case than meets the eye.
Twins often remain smaller than singletons in their early years.
I was going to post the reward poster but apparently they don't want us to.
When I right click on it I get a copyright notice.
Sure does make it awfully hard for people to spread it around.
Someone would have to screenshot it.
Seems pretty counterproductive to me.:twocents:
http://www.thescottishsun.co.uk/sco....ece?CMP=SOC-Sun-Twitter-11_20_2013-191-0-0-0
me too! (aaaannnndd... I spelled it wrong too! hahahaha)
Average newborn baby is 50cm, so it's extremely unlikely he is only 60cm! The police originally said 90cm (3 feet) which would still be on the small side for a 3y8m boy so I have no idea where this 2 foot figure has come from but it's all over the press and clearly wrong!
Won't touch anything to do with the S*n with a bargepole, sorry. Anyone who gets my sig, will understand why.