- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
- Messages
- 422
- Reaction score
- 2,578
Just to saySounds like it to me. In the programme P said when he went downstairs everything was ready to go so it sounds like N wanted to get there sharpish in time for the teams meeting. I thought P came across completely natural and devastated and even said he called her twice when she was late getting back so for those trolls pointing fingers at him they’re very very wrong and need to stop it.
the window between 9.33 and 10.50 that you refer to… can you just clarify .That's true , since she used Teams regularly it would make sense that it would be set up to silence incoming calls during live meetings , thus negating this possibility .
Yet , if other witnesses had arrived on the scene they might have been looking or standing by or near the bench ( after all PA's calls were after 10 , we still have a 9:33-10:50 window , it's a long time that is still somewhat foggy to me ...especially with regards as to who was near that bench , with the dog AFTER 9:33 )
We know she had disappeared by 9.33 and her phone etc were found then in the vicinity of bench. So what happened between 9.33 and 10.50? Sorry to appear simple but was it the police who arrived at 10.50? Are we thinking that the be ch area was deserted ( as far as we know) from 9.33 until 10.50.
If an assailant was in the vicinity there was nothing more to be done in that window surely because he/ she would be totally occupied with NB