- Joined
- Jul 11, 2016
- Messages
- 508
- Reaction score
- 4,660
Whilst the press can sensationalise, it’s NB’s partner who has confirmed she had issues. As there is no suggestion he has done anything wrong, I believe him and think NB did have certain issues. I think he disclosed them being honest and trying to help — I think it’s straightforward enough in that when NB went missing the police asked, as a matter of course, what was going on in her life and PA told them the truth.I'm in two-minds about whether her "demons" have been exaggerated by media.
But then the 10th January welfare -check by police makes me think maybe not.
Difficult one.
I think some of the backlash against the police releasing information about NB is telling about how society really doesn’t like to be confronted with “everyday” addiction and mental health issues. We want the extreme case of an addict or someone struggling so we can point at it and say, “there we go, definitely nothing like me.” But alcohol problems affect the capable and loving mum at the school gate as well as the rock star who’s in rehab again or the homeless guy sleeping outside Victoria Station. The press’s reaction about “ruined reputation” kind of sums up our media. Here was a chance to do some responsible and sympathetic pieces on how common alcohol problems are, instead we are acting like they’re rare or shocking and make someone a bad person.
We can add this to the media’s chosen narrative in this case which is that the police are wrong about everything, even though the police were right as to what happened. Today I’ve seen “the police didn’t find Nicola, some dog walkers did”, as a gotcha, even though it isn’t statistically uncommon for members of the public to find bodies even of people who have been looked for, for weeks. It’s got ridiculous. I’m no real fan of the police but they were right, Nicola was in the water.