I'll be very surprised if Coroner does not return a verdict of accidental death.
Hopefully it will shut the conspiracy theorists though they are currently as rampant as usual on social media.
Idiots.
Nothing will shut them up. They are best ignored.
I'll be very surprised if Coroner does not return a verdict of accidental death.
Hopefully it will shut the conspiracy theorists though they are currently as rampant as usual on social media.
Idiots.
Truth.Sometimes, a tragic accident is a tragic accident. All evidence we've heard in the inquest does not indicate any foul play whatsoever. It seems to be very clear from testimony that it was an accident.
I'm sorry Nicola's loved ones also have to contend with unfounded rumors of a crime that didn't happen.
<modsnip>
Please feel free to come back on any of these specific aspects that came out of yesterday's evidence.
1 A witness puts another female in the field at 9.15.The other female says they got there at 9.30.Which one is lying on oath and why
2 Another witness references a man dressed in black being in the vicinity of Nicola around this time. Has he been found and eliminated
3 The Police view is she entered the water around 9.22.At that time one person left at 9.18,another person may have been there depending on point and another unidentified person was reported as being there. So why was nothing seen or heard
4 The Hypothesis comes from an increased heart rate at 9.22.This could also be explained by an altercation with someone still present. I would also ask why the time her heart beat stopped recording hasn't been released as this is key evidence and will be known
5 if we accept 9.22 as her time of entering the water, why is fitbit recording steps for a further 8 minutes which is ample time to exit the water and/or scream for assistance
6 Two separate people heard screams around 9.35,have these been investigated or are we to believe these respected people are also lying
Aside from the evidence heard two other key aspects exist. The first is why was Willow dry, every owner of a springer I've talked to says their dog would enter the water if their mum was struggling. The second is why was the body not found for 23 days despite the most extensive search of water in our history.
Both of these can be explained if an altercation took place.
<modsnip> All I would say is if this was a loved one of mine there are questions I'd like answers to before accepting the decision.
RIP Nicola and may your family get the findings they want even if some of us disagree with it
Cheers, that adds more context. Looks like just a sad coincidence.Describing the encounter as "brief", Dr Leevy said in a review of the service provided to the Bulley family, it was found she had been in receipt of the crisis service even though she "did not wholly meet the criteria".
![]()
Nicola Bulley was looking forward to future, says partner
The mother-of-two had a "blip" over Christmas but was back to herself in January, an inquest hears.www.bbc.com
Maybe just a knee-jerk reaction during the phone call since she had been struggling in the not-too-distant past?I have no problem with whatever verdict a highly experienced coroner decides to deliver. There’s just one thing puzzling me:
When contacted with the news that Nicola had disappeared, her partner reportedly responded with the words “She’s struggling“. Yet in his testimony he emphasised how positive she was feeling about the future. Perhaps both can be true but it does seem strange.
I'm not saying it's the case here, but there is a thing called confirmation bias where if you have an opinion or view you tend (and it's typically unconsciously) look for evidence that supports that view and disregard evidence that goes against it.My view has remained consistent throughout in that this is very unlikely to have been an accident, and the evidence provided yesterday only re-enforces this view.
It was true. She had been struggling, but she was doing better in recent days/weeks. He probably felt it relevant to mention/it came to mind, but that doesn't change what happened.I have no problem with whatever verdict a highly experienced coroner decides to deliver. There’s just one thing puzzling me:
When contacted with the news that Nicola had disappeared, her partner reportedly responded with the words “She’s struggling“. Yet in his testimony he emphasised how positive she was feeling about the future. Perhaps both can be true but it does seem strange.
Just a personal view, but, if Nicola, someone with her life quite together, a job she was good at, and people who loved her, was going through spells of problem drinking (the call her sister made, Paul’s observations) and then stopping (no alcohol in her system, Paul confirming she had stopped) and being more stable: it can get bad pretty fast, but it can get good pretty fast, too.I have no problem with whatever verdict a highly experienced coroner decides to deliver. There’s just one thing puzzling me:
When contacted with the news that Nicola had disappeared, her partner reportedly responded with the words “She’s struggling“. Yet in his testimony he emphasised how positive she was feeling about the future. Perhaps both can be true but it does seem strange.