No, I think it might be about the same.
I don't think the approach will be the same, going through the babies' background health or what she would do in the course of normal nursing duties, and I don't think the prosecution will be aiming to get her to reverse her denials, I think it will be more about -
motivation and means -
highlighting her oppositional characteristics, (complaining, attitudes towards babies' parents, disrespect for rules/authority/others, believing she's better than...), asking her if parents or others lied and what would motivate them to lie, highlighting every time she manipulated others with her texts and checked out what others were thinking, highlighting how she could deceive by writing false entries in the notes or not reporting certain things to reviewing doctors, highlighting how babies had repeating problems every time she was around and how those same problems occurred with other babies in the charges too, highlighting how every time it seemed she might be associated there was a corresponding shift in alleged method of attacks, how she forged friendships with two doctors perhaps to gain their trust or keeping feelers out, etc
opportunity -
proving she had opportunity for every allegation, by going over the exact time it happened and where she was, asking her to account for all those minutes, and pointing out how others were distracted with tasks at the time or nurses/parents had just left the cotside or room.
I could be totally wrong.
MOO
