They wouldn't abandon the trial, they would proceed with 11 jurors. A jury panel can go down to 9.I totally agree, even for anything over 3 months. I think complex fraud cases have a panel of judges rather than a jury, but I may be mistaken.
I wonder what options the judge is thinking of? Allowing fewer jurors? I hope to god he doesn't abandon the trial after 7 months. The nightmare for all the parents, not to mention the costs incurred to the taxpayer. The defence barristers will be on an hourly rate.
Given the length of this trial so far, what if a juror became pregnant near the beginning ? As things stand, they would likely give birth while the trial was continuing. Presumably court wouldn’t compel a new mum to leave their newborn and get back into court. But if you have already lost the “spare” jurors you started the trial with for various reasons, what then happens? Mistrial and start again?I still can't shake off the feeling that many of the jurors absences could be the same person..I'm not saying all.
And many seem to be immediately following breaks or special events
They are pretty close to the finish line. Drop the one who is struggling [can't say I blame them]---and go with 11.They wouldn't abandon the trial, they would proceed with 11 jurors. A jury panel can go down to 9.
Even a panel of judges can have adverse personal life circumstances/ill health.
They are pretty close to the finish line. Drop the one who is struggling [can't say I blame them]---and go with 11.
I am amazed all 12 have made it this far. It must be gruelling and depressing to be sitting for this gruesome trial.
I know the jurors were told at the beginning that the trial was expected to last until late May but I wonder if jurors were also told “but you mustn’t book any holidays until (eg) august at the earliest to be on the safe side.”They are pretty close to the finish line. Drop the one who is struggling [can't say I blame them]---and go with 11.
I am amazed all 12 have made it this far. It must be gruelling and depressing to be sitting for this gruesome trial.
“Beyond Easter”…. Like 4 months beyond Easter or 4 years? How ominous and soul destroyingFrom Jan 10th -
10:35am
He tells the jury we are "not halfway through" the prosecution case, and the trial will not resume today.
It is now anticipated the case will run until May. Previously the jury had been told the case could run beyond Easter.
There will be a break for Easter, from April 6-17. After that point, the only planned interruptions will be for public Bank Holidays.
Members of the jury are being told not to book any holidays beyond Easter.
![]()
Recap: Lucy Letby trial, Tuesday, January 10 curtailed due to juror absence
The trial of Lucy Letby, who denies murdering seven babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit and attempting to murder 10 more,…www.chesterstandard.co.uk
10:39am
Eleven of the 12 members of the jury come into court.
The judge tells them the trial cannot proceed unless all 12 of them are present, and one is not present for "particular personal reasons".
"There is obvious uncertainty in relation to your colleague's position", he adds.
The jury are urged to turn up tomorrow unless they hear otherwise.
The judge tells the jury: "We have had a lot of breaks, and there comes a time where we cannot keep having more and more breaks, as it becomes inappropriate.
"Events do occur which are unexpected, and we have had a few during this case."
The court is told that a view will be taken tomorrow on the 12th juror.
![]()
Recap: Lucy Letby trial, May 30 - trial adjourned again
The trial of Lucy Letby, who denies murdering seven babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit and attempting to murder 10 more, was…www.chesterstandard.co.uk
There are lots of retired folks on juries. It could be someone who is exhausted by this trial and it affects their immune system. I think it would be too much for me, these days, if I had to go to court for 6 months and sit through this horror.^ That kind of makes it sound like s/he's a serial offender...
Well it’s not just the defendant and the jury. This is clogging up the system.I think it’s time the judge is going to have to make some harsh decisions regarding the Jury and the time they are sitting. If a two day week has been negotiated, it may need to be re-examined as it’s no good dragging this trial on and possibly causing a mistrial.
There’s a balance between protecting the health of the defendant and the health of the jury and if my opinion is correct, they need to get back to 6 hour court days at least 4 days a week, the same as afforded to nearly every other defendant or the jury might just give up.
I understand her mental health might be poor, but it was her decision to take the stand, one she might regret, but still hers and she should in my opinion be reminded of that and submit to proper lengthy cross examination, similar to every other defendant for murder, rather than being treated better than most sexual assault survivors are.
No they can go down to 9 so if it is one juror in particular it makes sense to discharge themGiven the length of this trial so far, what if a juror became pregnant near the beginning ? As things stand, they would likely give birth while the trial was continuing. Presumably court wouldn’t compel a new mum to leave their newborn and get back into court. But if you have already lost the “spare” jurors you started the trial with for various reasons, what then happens? Mistrial and start again?
^ That kind of makes it sound like s/he's a serial offender...
I think it’s time the judge is going to have to make some harsh decisions regarding the Jury and the time they are sitting. If a two day week has been negotiated, it may need to be re-examined as it’s no good dragging this trial on and possibly causing a mistrial.
There’s a balance between protecting the health of the defendant and the health of the jury and if my opinion is correct, they need to get back to 6 hour court days at least 4 days a week, the same as afforded to nearly every other defendant or the jury might just give up.
I understand her mental health might be poor, but it was her decision to take the stand, one she might regret, but still hers and she should in my opinion be reminded of that and submit to proper lengthy cross examination, similar to every other defendant for murder, rather than being treated better than most sexual assault survivors are.
There are lots of retired folks on juries. It could be someone who is exhausted by this trial and it affects their immune system. I think it would be too much for me, these days, if I had to go to court for 6 months and sit through this horror.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.