Marantz4250b
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 23, 2020
- Messages
- 3,292
- Reaction score
- 18,455
He's probably going to bore us all to sleep.
I'm curious to see what he says about LL's character. It's still perplexing me why noone came to LL's aid.
I have been trying to understand all this 'good and bad character stuff' and the 'applications' which are really confusing.
However it does seem that the only reference to LL's good character that has been made was in the opening speeches. "She was a dedicated nurse"
And all his questioning was "did she work hard?' 'was she good at her job?'
Zero on the kind of person she was from BM yet plenty from NJ on her bad character.
From what I read, it was really confusing around what is and is allowed to be said about any witnesses character. Everything apparantly having to go through a prior application process?
So Myers is not allowed to make inferences about the characters of all of the witnesses to prove his own case. Which is probably why he was so gentle with the drs just dancing around points saying things like
'so that was your gotcha moment was it?'
Whilst with Evans a 'bad character application' was made so now Myers can now discredit him at any opportunity and hence Bohin is largely the Dr referenced instead?
![]()
Bad Character Evidence — Defence-Barrister.co.uk
Understand the implications of bad character evidence in court, including its use and impact on cases. Visit Defence-Barrister.co.uk for detailed insights.www.defence-barrister.co.uk
Her "good character" is largely irrelevant, though. You can't just use the defence of she can't have done it because everyone thinks she's lovely and her parents adore her because it in no way counters the evidence presented by the prosecution.
Someone may be the most hard working, most skilled nurse in history but that isn't evidence that they didn't inject insulin into a TPN bag.