UK - Nurse Lucy Letby Faces 22 Charges - 7 Murder/15 Attempted Murder of Babies #5

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #441
I don't believe it was nothing but her presence that raised the alarm. The sudden collapses were unexpected, and the babies were unusually difficult to resuscitate.

Then there are the dislodged tubes, the bleeding from the mouth, the mottled appearance, failure of alarm to go off, witness statements, texts, observations by parents, inconsistencies in the nurses notes, the FB searches, Letby's inappropriate comments, ignoring the direction of leading nurse to not care for baby C, increase in incidents when moved to day shift, and the post it notes!

I'm sure I'm missing something.

Yeh it’s just I think that if all those things happened and it was done deliberately by someone who was being observed surely there would be a witness to something more than what has been currently offered. I think we have a run down of what the prosecution have to offer with the opening in terms of weird going’s on and in contrast the defences position of “circumstantial evidence” seems more fitting. However I can totally see where you are at.
 
  • #442
Yeh it’s just I think that if all those things happened and it was done deliberately by someone who was being observed surely there would be a witness to something more than what has been currently offered. I think we have a run down of what the prosecution have to offer with the opening in terms of weird going’s on and in contrast the defences position of “circumstantial evidence” seems more fitting. However I can totally see where you are at.
Yes, if a witness had observed foul play without a doubt, that would be direct evidence.

Circumstantial cases are usually overwhelming, there is so much evidence to consider. It can be very hard to see the whole picture, especially at this early stage of the trial.
 
  • #443
I can think of one thing so far maybe two. When LL denied knowing what an embolism was. With everyone else stating it’s such a thing amongst nurses and working practice it’s almost unbelievable that she wouldn’t know right? I would like a bit more detail surrounding that as it’s questionable. I could have sworn it’s a well known thing generally speaking. It’s likely a lie though? Imagine playing dumb to the police “I don’t even know what murder is mr officerrr” bats eyelashes. Interesting.
 
  • #444
I can think of one thing so far maybe two. When LL denied knowing what an embolism was. With everyone else stating it’s such a thing amongst nurses and working practice it’s almost unbelievable that she wouldn’t know right? I would like a bit more detail surrounding that as it’s questionable. I could have sworn it’s a well known thing generally speaking. It’s likely a lie though? Imagine playing dumb to the police “I don’t even know what murder is mr officerrr” bats eyelashes. Interesting.
Yes, of course she would know. She also denied things she later admitted to- probably when confronted with the evidence.
 
  • #445
I can think of one thing so far maybe two. When LL denied knowing what an embolism was. With everyone else stating it’s such a thing amongst nurses and working practice it’s almost unbelievable that she wouldn’t know right? I would like a bit more detail surrounding that as it’s questionable. I could have sworn it’s a well known thing generally speaking. It’s likely a lie though? Imagine playing dumb to the police “I don’t even know what murder is mr officerrr” bats eyelashes. Interesting.
Did she deny knowing this? I've been skimming through the reports so may have missed this. Difficult to believe that a nurse wouldn't know this. Has this been introduced into evidence?
 
  • #446
Did she deny knowing this? I've been skimming through the reports so may have missed this. Difficult to believe that a nurse wouldn't know this. Has this been introduced into evidence.

Apparently yes someone upthread mentioned it but I haven’t seen it myself. The quote that is.

Yes, of course she would know. She also denied things she later admitted to- probably when confronted with the evidence.

Yeh I don’t know how much of a hiccup that is tbh. Are you sure? I can’t think of anything else as noticeably out? Apparently allot of the stories have changed including the doctors, I would assume it’s part of the process.
 
  • #447
Apparently yes someone upthread mentioned it but I haven’t seen it myself. The quote that is.



Yeh I don’t know how much of a hiccup that is tbh. Are you sure? I can’t think of anything else as noticeably out? Apparently allot of the stories have changed including the doctors, I would assume it’s part of the process.
Sure about what?
 
  • #448
Did she deny knowing this? I've been skimming through the reports so may have missed this. Difficult to believe that a nurse wouldn't know this. Has this been introduced into evidence?
I don't know if she denied knowing what an embolus is. All I recall is that she told police it would be very hard to push air through the line.
 
  • #449
Sure about what?

There are other instances of things directly to do with Lucy that are not what one would expect. I know stories change as with everyone seemingly but that’s obviously out.
 
  • #450
Did she deny knowing this? I've been skimming through the reports so may have missed this. Difficult to believe that a nurse wouldn't know this. Has this been introduced into evidence?

2:23pm

She agreed she had been taught to prime lines so air could not get in them.
She denied having done so via Child A's long line or UVC.
She said she didn't know exactly what an air embolism was.

 
  • #451
How a highly specialised (posters here claimed so) nurse can't know what air embolism is? o_O
 
  • #452
An embolism refers to the actual blockage of a vessel not the presence of air in the blood which might not be the Connection she is making but the thing she was trained not to do?
Did say “exactly what an embolism is”. I knew the presence of air in the blood isn’t good but not sure I could tell you it was an “embolism” if it becomes a problem.
 
  • #453
An embolism refers to the actual blockage of a vessel not the presence of air in the blood which might not be the Connection she is making but the thing she was trained not to do?
Did say “exactly what an embolism is”. I knew the presence of air in the blood isn’t good but not sure I could tell you it was an “embolism” if it becomes a problem.
Any level of qualified nurse would know what an air embolism is let alone a band 6 who had done post graduate training in neonatal nursing imo
 
Last edited:
  • #454
Especially one who had watched a documentary on an air embolism in a babies bowel around the time of baby A and B‘s alleged assaults.
Any level of qualified nurse would know what an air embolism is let alone a band 6 who had done post graduate training in neonatal nursing
 
  • #455
An embolism refers to the actual blockage of a vessel not the presence of air in the blood which might not be the Connection she is making but the thing she was trained not to do?
Did say “exactly what an embolism is”. I knew the presence of air in the blood isn’t good but not sure I could tell you it was an “embolism” if it becomes a problem.
If nurses are taught to be very careful about not letting air through the line, wouldn't they also be taught the reasons why this would be dangerous?
 
  • #456
Especially one who had watched a documentary on an air embolism in a babies bowel around the time of baby A and B‘s alleged assaults.
And, investigators would have known about the documentary when they asked her those questions, imo.
 
  • #457
Any level of qualified nurse would know what an air embolism is let alone a band 6 who had done post graduate training in neonatal nursing
I didn't know she had done post graduate training. Don't know how I missed that.

The lead nurse, or maybe the nurse who trained her, did say LL was professional.
 
  • #458
An embolism refers to the actual blockage of a vessel not the presence of air in the blood which might not be the Connection she is making but the thing she was trained not to do?
Did say “exactly what an embolism is”. I knew the presence of air in the blood isn’t good but not sure I could tell you it was an “embolism” if it becomes a problem.
As far as I know it is ABC in educational system for nurses.

If not - how scary for potential patients!

But, who knows, maybe somebody played truant during important lectures/classes.
Oh well...

Moo
 
  • #459
How a highly specialised (posters here claimed so) nurse can't know what air embolism is? o_O
In what context was this?

If under the stress of aggressive interrogation, I wouldn't be surprised if she forgot her own name.
 
  • #460
2:23pm

She agreed she had been taught to prime lines so air could not get in them.
She denied having done so via Child A's long line or UVC.
She said she didn't know exactly what an air embolism was.

That's really weird because lines one and three of that are logically incompatible. If you've been taught the former you know that the reason you're taught it is so that the latter doesn't happen! You cannot not know what an air embolism is in those circumstances.

I do wonder whether this is perhaps a transcription error on the part of the reporter? Do they actually mean that she did not know how and air embolism could happen, for example?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
2,331
Total visitors
2,410

Forum statistics

Threads
632,760
Messages
18,631,375
Members
243,285
Latest member
shhhe
Back
Top