- Joined
- Oct 24, 2022
- Messages
- 2,971
- Reaction score
- 9,350
I don't believe it was nothing but her presence that raised the alarm. The sudden collapses were unexpected, and the babies were unusually difficult to resuscitate.
Then there are the dislodged tubes, the bleeding from the mouth, the mottled appearance, failure of alarm to go off, witness statements, texts, observations by parents, inconsistencies in the nurses notes, the FB searches, Letby's inappropriate comments, ignoring the direction of leading nurse to not care for baby C, increase in incidents when moved to day shift, and the post it notes!
I'm sure I'm missing something.
Yeh it’s just I think that if all those things happened and it was done deliberately by someone who was being observed surely there would be a witness to something more than what has been currently offered. I think we have a run down of what the prosecution have to offer with the opening in terms of weird going’s on and in contrast the defences position of “circumstantial evidence” seems more fitting. However I can totally see where you are at.