Obviously, all of the crimes are horrendous...but if she's guilty of deliberating trying to kill both of their babies, knowing how long they had waited for them and how wanted these babies were, that is a whole other level of vindictiveness and spite. I can't even put it into strong enough words. It's just evil.Right from Baby A, if this could be deemed relevant - because he collapsed and died within the first hour after handover -
“LL also told detectives that she knew Baby A and his twin sister Baby B were much wanted babies and his parents had waited a long time for them. The interviewing officer then asked “who told you that?” and she replied “it was known through the nursing handover we had”. She was then asked if that sort of information would change the way she would deal with parents, and she said “no, I would like to think we treat all the parents the same, but you bear in mind what they’ve gone through to get to this point”.”
The Trial of Lucy Letby, Episode 3: Baby A - The Mail
I wonder if the ages of the parents had anything to do with the alleged crimes. We can't sleuth this or discuss specifics obviously. MOO
I also think the IVF may have possibly been a factor. I just can’t shake the comment she made in a text to a colleague about the deaths of babies ‘I do think there is an element of fate involved in this’
Could IVF be something she considered to not be natural and therefore not involve ‘fate’? Because to me, that is a very strange comment to make, who would believe that ‘fate’ is the reason tiny babies are dying? IMO of course…
I too believe that the parents were actually the desired target, when I look at the charges and see that 2 babies from a set of triplets died, aswell as how it seems both babies in sets of twins were targeted, if it was nothing to do with hurting the parents then IMO, after killing one baby why would one immediately move on to that child’s twin, knowing the absolute agony the parents would experience, losing not one but both of their children? I’m sure there were other babies in the nicu, but it seems that someone made the calculated decision to move onto the remaining twin after the death of their sibling. If that isn’t punishing parents then I don’t know what is. MOO
I think it may be explaining the charts shown? Like those ones in school where it was shown in blue? Then the air bubbles being absorbed would show as the blotchy discolorations that are blue/purple in colour which does happen due to lack of oxygen in the blood aka cyanosisI've got to be honest I'm not following the scientific explanations being given today about how an embolus would cause the skin colourations seen. It's no doubt from dodgy reporting, but It seems to suggest that the colours of the rash are from the blood being deoxygenated. But deoxygenated blood isn't blue, as reported by the Chester Standard. It's dark red!
That would make sense if the expert was directing the jury's attention to the chart, saying the blue bits are the deoxygenated blood returning to the heart. From the reporting it sounded like she was saying deoxygenated blood is blue!I think it may be explaining the charts shown? Like those ones in school where it was shown in blue? Then the air bubbles being absorbed would show as the blotchy discolorations that are blue/purple in colour which does happen due to lack of oxygen in the blood aka cyanosis
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.