UK - Rebecca Joynes, teacher, accused of sex offence against 2 pupils

  • #141
All set for tomorrow:
Court 5 - sitting at 10:00 am

HER HONOUR JUDGE CORNELL



SITTING AT 10:15 am

For Mention and to Fix

T20197662SMITH Chadley06AA5499919GMANMCPS

RE: POCA


SITTING AT 10:30 am

For Sentence

T20227370JOYNES Rebecca06FF0620721GMANMCPS

Reporting restrictions under Section 2 of the Sexual Offenders Amendment Act 1992 and Section 4(2) of the Contempt of Court Act. Res HHJ Cornell. Defendant to Attend


T20237060JOYNES Rebecca06FF0427223MANCMCPS
 
  • #142
In the eyes of those who knew her, Rebecca Joynes was a “nice and quiet” person who lived in a leafy village.

Growing up, Joynes was the eldest of two children who enjoyed gymnastics and dancing.

Joynes was described by her dad, who attended court to support his daughter, as a “perfect child in every way” who from “child to adult was always at the top.”




more at the link...........



That quote from is it the accused’s father saying: from “child to adult was always at the top.”

Going to leave that right there. SMH.

And from observing details on this case, if / when convicted seems this individual needs to be precluded from contact with children and young adults. MOO
 
  • #143
That quote from is it the accused’s father saying: from “child to adult was always at the top.”

Going to leave that right there. SMH.
Wish there was a green sick emoji
 
  • #144
  • #145
I’m glad she’s turned up at court I had a feeling she’d try and end things prior to sentencing.

I know people who have worked with her, she was always very cold and standoffish and had more interest in showing off with the students rather than interacting with staff.

I also know the school she was at but as it’s not been released in the press due to protecting the boys identity I won’t mention it.

I hope the court passes a long sentence today
 
  • #146
Guided ?
Just walk into court normally, no need for a headlock.
Her mum who’s driving can bring her bag in when she’s parked up.
Strange family.
JMO
 
  • #147
  • #148
Re her coming to Court
carrying "bags of life" :D

It is called THEATRICS
Hahaha
 
  • #149
He runs a tea shop on the Wirral .. with a soon to be convicted daughter.
He needs to stay in lane here.
 
  • #150
Re her coming to Court
carrying "bags of life" :D

It is called THEATRICS
Hahaha
I wonder if the pink bonnet will put in an appearance
 
  • #151
Not seen it so far !
 
  • #152
Dbm
 
Last edited:
  • #153
  • #154
I find the families behaviour very strange

Like at this stage she’s been found guilty do you really want to be seen walking into court with her? Especially when you own a business which relies on the public
 
  • #155

"Maximum sentences
Prosecutor Joe Allman has told the court the sentencing guidelines in relation to the offences against Rebecca Joynes.

The maximum sentence for sexual activity with a child is 14 years in prison.

The maximum sentence for sexual activity with a child by a person in a position of trust is five years behind bars."

How is this right? How is the maximum sentence almost 10 years LESS if the accused is in a position of trust? I don't understand.
 
  • #156
  • #157

"Maximum sentences
Prosecutor Joe Allman has told the court the sentencing guidelines in relation to the offences against Rebecca Joynes.

The maximum sentence for sexual activity with a child is 14 years in prison.

The maximum sentence for sexual activity with a child by a person in a position of trust is five years behind bars."

How is this right? How is the maximum sentence almost 10 years LESS if the accused is in a position of trust? I don't understand.
I think the poster below is correct it’s two separate charges

I can’t see it being anything near that I’m going for 5-7 years
 
Last edited:
  • #158

"Maximum sentences
Prosecutor Joe Allman has told the court the sentencing guidelines in relation to the offences against Rebecca Joynes.

The maximum sentence for sexual activity with a child is 14 years in prison.

The maximum sentence for sexual activity with a child by a person in a position of trust is five years behind bars."

How is this right? How is the maximum sentence almost 10 years LESS if the accused is in a position of trust? I don't understand.
I believe that the "in a position of trust" charges relate to offences against boy B after he had turned 16, therefore above the age of consent, but it is still illegal due to her being his teacher.
 
  • #159
Neil Foden the paedophile headteacher got 17 years recently.
 
  • #160
I believe that the "in a position of trust" charges relate to offences against boy B after he had turned 16, therefore above the age of consent, but it is still illegal due to her being his teacher.

I understand that they are 2 different charges. I just don't understand the vast difference in the sentencing guidelines. Both the offences are for sexual activity with a child, so I don't understand why the sentencing guidelines max sentence is a lot higher if the accused is NOT in a position of trust. Surely the offence is worse (aggravating features) if the accused IS in a position of trust?
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
122
Guests online
1,613
Total visitors
1,735

Forum statistics

Threads
638,756
Messages
18,733,067
Members
244,531
Latest member
code:CROW
Back
Top