GUILTY UK - Rebecca Watts, 16, Bristol, 19 Feb 2015 #12

[Tortoise]

phew!! really thought she'd done something then

 

[sar2them1984]

How bizarre - seems a delay for nowt!

Must say I'm VERY surprised at the softly softly approach by prosecution towards Shauna...their case really isn't very strong at all

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

 

[still-searching]

Can't be a toilet break, we know she rarely needs to wee.

Has she not got her bucket on the stand with her?

 

[Clio]

ITV Becky Trial ‏@ITVBeckyTrial · 24 secs24 seconds ago
James Ireland denies assisting an offender. #beckywatts

 

[mrazda71]

Eurgh enough with the urination remarks now ...

 

[ColourPurple]

I thought SH would have been questioned more but I think I read on Uk & Eire that pros had pointe dout five contradictions in her statements so maybe he thinks that's enough?

 

[Alyce]

Lets hope his evidence is good

 

[Clio]

skyfieldnewsed ‏@skyrobcatherall · 42 secs42 seconds ago
Ireland, dressed in a blue sweater, answering questions about his early life, family, school etc. #BeckyWatts

 

[LBB]

I missed most of yesterday and haven't had a chance to catch up.

Am I right to think SH gave evidence, SH was cross examined by pros, SH then gave further evidence via more questions for Her barrister?

Where re there any questions by any of the other defenxe barristers or more questions from prosecution?

 

[sar2them1984]

skyfieldnewsed ‏@skyrobcatherall · 42 secs42 seconds ago
Ireland, dressed in a blue sweater, answering questions about his early life, family, school etc. #BeckyWatts

See its is what I don't get. JI is on a lesser charge yet is going through his early life etc yet there was very little reported about whether the same was done for SH/NM

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

 

[Alyce]

I missed most of yesterday and haven't had a chance to catch up.

Am I right to think SH gave evidence, SH was cross examined by pros, SH then gave further evidence via more questions for Her barrister?

Where re there any questions by any of the other defenxe barristers or more questions from prosecution?

No, your outline is correct. It was SHs Defence, then straight to the Prosecution cross. None of the other Defence Barristers asked her anything.
Today has just been her Defence for half an hour and now her evidence is finished.

 

[Clio]

I missed most of yesterday and haven't had a chance to catch up.

Am I right to think SH gave evidence, SH was cross examined by pros, SH then gave further evidence via more questions for Her barrister?

Yes

Where re there any questions by any of the other defenxe barristers or more questions from prosecution?

No

 

[Alyce]

See its is what I don't get. JI is on a lesser charge yet is going through his early life etc yet there was very little reported about whether the same was done for SH/NM

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

My thoughts exactly. I can easily see the relevance for NM and SH, but not at all for JI.

 

[Clio]

See its is what I don't get. JI is on a lesser charge yet is going through his early life etc yet there was very little reported about whether the same was done for SH/NM

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

Yes it was

 

[ColourPurple]

I missed most of yesterday and haven't had a chance to catch up.

Am I right to think SH gave evidence, SH was cross examined by pros, SH then gave further evidence via more questions for Her barrister?

Where re there any questions by any of the other defenxe barristers or more questions from prosecution?

Correct, and no questions from anyone else's lawyers. Yesterday ended with pros cross examinign SH and started again today with her own lawyer questioning her

 

[sar2them1984]

Yes it was

Aside from briefly going through SH period with foster parents little else was touched upon..or reported at least

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

 

[ColourPurple]

My thoughts exactly. I can easily see the relevance for NM and SH, but not at all for JI.

This is where ADHD and Autism could be brought up, maybe to show his naivety and how he was just doing his mate a favour

 

[Tortoise]

while a defendant is under oath their own legal team aren't allowed to consult with them. I doubt SH was talking about a change of plea.

 

[sar2them1984]

This is where ADHD and Autism could be brought up, maybe to show his naivety and how he was just doing his mate a favour

Good thinking!

Sent from my SM-N910F using Tapatalk

 

[Clio]

ITV Becky Trial ‏@ITVBeckyTrial · 36 secs37 seconds ago
JI says he met Karl Demetrius through his work #beckywatts