Unfortunately I doubt that. They deal with homicides and other serious crimes.
I also think this has a complex nature because it occurred in a location with a lot of people, some transient, some subletting, some renting, airbnb, hotels etc. It can be very difficult to piece together information. Like the case of Andrew Gosden, who went missing in central London, people said how can he go missing where there is so much CCTV, but when there are a lot of options of what could have happened it can be overwhelming.
I keep thinking about the Brixton Water Lane interest. It's too far for her walk home. Leads me to believe they are chasing some kind of lead/activity so I'm inclined to say they have more footage of something yes.
Do we think they have CCTV from further along the route than the Poynders Road/Cavendish Road junction and Sarah's not on it?
Obviously obtaining and reviewing CCTV footage is very time consuming but you would think by now they would have managed to get something from the second half of her assumed route home?
Are you thinking that they could be interested in the movements of someone who lived in the Brixton Water Lane area?
Perhaps someone Sarah might know?
I see what you mean, that it was possibly beyond this point. There's likely CCTV whichever way she went home, such as at the Londis (Londis Clapham Park) and beyond this at the Tesco express, so if she isn't seen on more her route extent could be assumed by a process of elimination. Agnes Riley Gardens is a potential location of an attack, not very big but quite isolated. I think they will find something soon.
Are you thinking that they could be interested in the movements of someone who lived in the Brixton Water Lane area?
Perhaps someone Sarah might know?
I hope they have got that info to the police by now. Surely that would merit a 999 in the circumstances.
Remember that anyone can write a comment ,it might not necessarily be true.
I can't help thinking that LE are still looking at Clapham Common because someone (a witness) may have eyeballed a potential perp there at the time SE passed by there?
LE could be looking for potential perp evidence and not necessarily that of SE.
JMO
Do you think she could have made it home? Possibly encountered an intruder?
wonder what makes them think it could be a murder case? they must have found something to point them in this direction
If she was spotted on Poynders road, the logical route home would have been via New Park Road (I’ve walked this route myself). It was only in 2019/2020 that those really big 360 cctv cameras were installed there (not sure what they are called?) so surely she must have been spotted on those cameras? The police also listed NPR as one of the streets to look out for. I wonder where she could have been headed if not to New Park Road or if she even made it that far? It all seems very strange..
It takes police time to sift through the information on a tip line. This information, if correct, would be for emergency attention.Oh that is worrying. I hope they've contacted police now as it says they are stuggling to get throught on a 'tip line'. What is that?
Did she mean 11.50 am or 11.50 pm? How would you be able to tell if a person looked happy in the near pitch black? And why would anyone be passing the time at that hour?Bit odd that. She just casually tosses out 3 days after SE went missing, that she allegedly saw her over 2.5hrs after last sighting, and not saying whether she had already told police of this. Sounds like it is unreliable given that we have not had it mentioned officially.
Not looking good now that murder detectives have taken over the case:
Murder team takes over investigation of missing Sarah Everard