UK UK - STEPHEN PORT, Suspected SK of Male Victims, London

  • #101
How long does it take to find this man guilty? I know they need to go over every point but I can't imagine the jury won't return a unanimous verdict of guilty in this case. At least I hope so anyway.

Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk
 
  • #102
Lots of charges. I guess they go over everyone separately.
 
  • #103
[FONT=&quot]CourtNewsUK ‏@CourtNewsUK[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Gay serial killer Stephen Port guilty of three murders[/FONT]
 
  • #104
[FONT=&quot]CourtNewsUK ‏@CourtNewsUK[/FONT]
[FONT=&quot]Jury in Stephen Port serial murder case still deliberating on one murder and a series of other charges[/FONT]
 
  • #105
Three sexually motivated murders has to be a whole life tariff (seems to be a flurry of these lately). If the evidence isn't there for the other charges it won't really make any difference.
 
  • #106
He was also found guilty of 3 rapes, 3 sexual assaults and 7 counts of administering a substance with intent. More at link.
________________

Stephen Port, who was convicted of raping three other men, lured his victims to his London flat and secretly gave them GHB, the Old Bailey heard.

The 41-year-old chef was also found guilty of seven offences of administering a substance with intent and three sexual assaults.
He had denied 29 charges in total.

Between August 2014 and September 2015 Port murdered Gabriel Kovari, 22, from Lewisham, Daniel Whitworth, 21, from Gravesend, Kent, and Jack Taylor, 25, from Dagenham, east London.

The jury has yet to reach a verdict on a number of other charges including the alleged murder of Anthony Walgate, 23, who was found dead outside Port's flat in June 2014.

He met his victims on dating websites, including Grindr, and coaxed them to his home in Barking for sex before giving them fatal doses of drugs.

Their bodies were all found dumped in or near a graveyard within 500m of his house.

_92621665_464x2.jpg
At court: Danny Shaw - BBC Home Affairs Correspondent

As the 12 jurors took their seats, there was an almost palpable sense of tension.

Every day since Monday of last week, when the jury's deliberations began, relatives of Port's victims have gathered waiting for the outcome of this harrowing case.

At 10:35, the jury forewoman was asked whether they'd reached unanimous verdicts on each of the counts and, if so, what that verdict was.

When the first reply of "guilty" came back Port just sighed.
But to his right, there were sobs, tears and hugs among the parents and siblings of those who were murdered.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-38077859
 
  • #107
  • #108
Very long article in the Mail. On the radio it said sentencing will be on Friday, with the judge considering a whole life tariff.
_______________

As Port was convicted of four murders today, Scotland Yard announced 17 of its officers are the subject of a large-scale Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) probe into their handling of the killings.

They are also reviewing 58 other deaths in the capital linked to the drug GHB, which is used by some to increase sexual desire.
Port was arrested after the first death, but only charged with perverting the course of justice - meaning he carried on killing.

The family of the fourth man to die say they were forced to investigate the crimes themselves and it was they who spotted the similarities between the deaths. They have called for officers to be held accountable.

Met Commander Stuart Cundy has refused to comment fully until the IPCC investigation is concluded, but said it appears 'opportunities were missed' in bringing Port to justice.

[...]

Yet Jack's death was treated as non-suspicious by the Metropolitan Police as there were no obvious marks or wounds on his body and signs of drug abuse.

His sisters said 'We felt from the beginning, it was just 'another one' and nothing was taken seriously.

'If it had been a woman, there would have been more done. It's ridiculous. We had to fight from the beginning. We kept pushing for an investigation.'

The sisters continued: 'It's frustrating as you're talking about someone's life. How often does a young person pass away and they can't explain it.

'If you're going to say it's unexplained, you have got to say it's suspicious... this is somebody's life, somebody's son.'

Donna and Jenny claim police were 'very dismissive' of their concerns, but the family 'kept on and on and on' at them to investigate the case.

They carried out their own research and discovered the striking similarities between each of the young men who had died.

The sisters said: 'We read up, found out they were all found without phones. It was similar - too similar.

'We went online, found out where they were from and what their local paper had written about them at the time to see if there was any similarities. And everything was very similar.'

Jack's body was exhumed in December last year, following Port's arrest, and his family blamed the botched police investigation for putting them through more pain.

'Jack died in September. If they had looked into it at the time, Jack wouldn't have had to be brought back up in December.
'Jack shouldn't have had to go through that again. We shouldn't have had to go through that again.'

Donna, Jenny and their parents sat through every day of Port's six-week Old Bailey trial.

The mother of Port's first victim, Anthony Walgate, also criticised the police over the investigation, saying she was made to wait for information.

Speaking after his death, Sarah Sak told the Hull Daily Mail: 'Straight away I told police that I was 150 per cent sure it will not have been drink or drugs.

'He wouldn't touch beer. He would drink cocktails or wine. That was his thing.'

She said the 'police have shown our family no compassion whatsoever', adding: 'It is appalling. We have had to chase them for information.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3960026/Stephen-Port-guilty-murder.html#ixzz4QqtLjuuP
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
  • #109
CourtNewsUK ‏@CourtNewsUK [video=twitter;801453783138107392]https://twitter.com/CourtNewsUK/status/801453783138107392[/video]
Port sentence on Friday will prob be the first time defendants in separate trials have been been given whole life tems in one week
 
  • #110
CourtNewsUK ‏@CourtNewsUK [video=twitter;801464591880454145]https://twitter.com/CourtNewsUK/status/801464591880454145[/video]
Gay serial killer Stephen Port without his wig


 
  • #111
  • #112
Final tally:
_______________

The jury convicted Port of a total of 22 offences against 11 men, including the four murders, four rapes, 10 counts of administering a substance, and four sex assaults. He was cleared on three counts of rape.

http://www.itv.com/news/update/2016-11-23/jury-found-serial-killer-guilty-of-22-offences/

This brings the total count to 25. The BBC article you linked to in a previous post says total number of charges was 29. Who got it wrong?

Anyway, I'm very relieved he was found guilty for all murders. I feel for the families, it's terrible and unacceptable how the MET handled these murders. Those families who researched and wouldn't give up most likely saved some lives there.

The men he raped must be horrified knowing now what they had the luck to get out of alive.

He looks really scary without his wig, and 20 years older.

Ugh it's just such a horrible and tragic case.

Nothing more about the other men that were heard talking on the tapes while the rapes occurred?
 
  • #113
Mods, maybe the word "suspected" should be removed from the thread title now that he's been convicted?
 
  • #114
I'm pleased with the result and hope he does get a long sentence. I wonder if there will be any further enquiries into the other men on the tapes, I certainly hope so.
The families in this case should be applauded for persisting with their pursuit of justice. Something the police should be doing from the start, I certainly hope lessons will be learned here.

Sent from my F5121 using Tapatalk
 
  • #115
Oh my, looks like the police may have messed this up more than I imagined. AW was the first victim.

BBM.
________________

But police did not examine the computer seized from Stephen Port, despite prompting from those close to Walgate.

If they had, they would have found alarming evidence.

On 13 June 2014, Port first accessed Walgate's escort profile. Within minutes he had conducted a series of searches on Google and 🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 websites.

A few of the search terms he used that day were: "sleeping boy", "unconscious boys", "drugged and raped", "taking date rape drug", "gay teen knocked out raped" and "guy raped and tortured young nude boy".

Walgate's university friends pressed the police to do more.

"We had to badger them and almost feed them ideas," says China Dunning. "I'd be like, 'have you looked [through] his laptop'... and they'd be like 'it's a really expensive procedure to do that'."

Kiera Brennan says the same: 'They fobbed us off constantly… They kept saying 'we're going to, we're going to' and then didn't. And every time we phoned the police officer at the time who was dealing with us he was either not there or someone would take a message and he'd never call us back."

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/38045742?client=ms-android-hms-vf-gb
 
  • #116
Totally agree with the two E's. They need to find the other men in those tapes.
 
  • #117
From today's Daily Wail:

[h=1]Did he kill 58 victims? Gay chef who drugged, raped and murdered men he met on Grindr may be one of Britain's worst serial killers - yet he was freed after his first murder to strike again[/h]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3960026/Stephen-Port-guilty-murder.html

Given his age, 41, it's possible he could have been killing for more than 20 years.
 
  • #118
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-38045742

Stephen Port has been found guilty of murdering four young gay men and committing a number of drug rapes. But did police miss chances to stop him in his tracks?

Quite shocking how little they reacted to the first murder. I can't help but wonder if it had been young girls, would it be different?

At the end of summer 2014, three weeks apart, the bodies of two young men were found in the same east London churchyard by the same woman walking her dog.
Both men were of a similar build. Both in their twenties. Both propped up in the same position in the graveyard.
Both men were gay. Both died from drug overdoses. Neither came from Barking, the area in which they had been found.
Police deemed the deaths of the men found in the churchyard, Gabriel Kovari and Daniel Whitworth, to be non-suspicious.

Three weeks apart, identical circumstances and this is non suspicious?? Unless Barking has a massive drugs problem, surely this should have been picked up
 
  • #119
It's getting worse for the police. Article on Daniel Whiworth's coroner's inquest.

Transcripts, obtained by the BBC, show coroner Nadia Persaud questioned Det Insp Rolf Schamberger about the police response to the death.

She noted that a pathologist had recommended the bed-sheet should be further examined, and asked whether that had been done.

Det Insp Schamberger said it had not, saying the "circumstances at the time indicated towards no other external parties being involved".

"The potential outcome of having the blanket analysed, the bed-sheet analysed, could have been to identify maybe where he had been the night before, who had contact with him. But it wasn't submitted," he added.

When the bed-sheet was tested, after Jack Taylor's death, it was covered in Port's DNA and was found to be from his bed.

Police had samples of Port's DNA, so would have been able to identify him, had they checked.

[...]

"And, given the circumstances that he was found with the note that he had written, and the small brown bottle containing the liquid which turned out to be a drug that..."

The coroner interrupted to ask: "That was tested, was it?"

The response came: "It was tested and found to contain G (or GHB). But there was nothing to indicate that it hadn't been self-administered, and that it appeared to be a suicide."

When he was then asked if the bottle was tested for fingerprints or DNA, Det Insp Schamberger said he thought only the contents were tested.

Port's DNA was also later found on the bottle.

Det Insp Schamberger told the inquest that police officers had checked the note found with Whitworth's body against one of his diaries, but confirmed that a handwriting expert had not been consulted.

When it was eventually checked, an expert concluded that the author of the note was not Whitworth but the handwriting was a match for Port's.

The coroner asked if attempts had been made to trace the person referred to in the note.

The detective said attempts had been made but that none "provided any further leads as to who he might have been with on that night."

In the eventual trial of Stephen Port, prosecutors said: "Daniel's movements prior to his death were not checked, and no attempt was made to trace the person referred to in the note as 'the guy I was with last night'."

[...]

Recording an open verdict at the inquest, coroner Nadia Persaud concluded by saying she had "some concerns" surrounding Mr Whitworth's death which had not been answered by the police investigation.

Most concerning were the pathologist's findings of manual handling prior to his death, she said, highlighting a suggestion that someone had lifted Mr Whitworth from under his arms.

"This does raise, in my mind, the question of someone moving him," she said as she ended the inquest at Walthamstow Coroner's Court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38096318

ETA: The coroner recorded an open verdict.
 
  • #120
I find this case so, so disturbing. I don't like to think about the fact that in this day and age, the police are still so prejudiced and negligent. It makes me feel very unsafe.

I really do think that if it had been young women who kept being found dead, foul play would have been suspected immediately and a thorough investigation would have been carried out. But because these were gay men, the police weren't interested.

JMO.
 

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
57
Guests online
2,111
Total visitors
2,168

Forum statistics

Threads
632,537
Messages
18,628,082
Members
243,188
Latest member
toofreakinvivid
Back
Top