GUILTY UK - Tia Sharp, 12, New Addington, London, 3 Aug 2012 #3

[MobyBluff]

similar to what?

not to each other.

Why they do rhyme ;-)))

 

[Clio]

only as a filmed version

the original has been pulled

i'm still not sure why the filmed one is still there to be honest, thought it would have been pulled ages ago.

plus there are a few bits missing from the one that's still there

I'm not talking about the one that's in 3 parts. This one is the ITV News which 10:32 long.

 

[India99]

I'm not talking about the one that's in 3 parts. This one is the ITV News which 10:32 long.

have you got a link to it

 

[kaos]

I posted links earlier in the thread but the videos kept embedding into the posts.

Type this into youtube and you should see all 3 of them.


Stuart Hazell interview [FULL] pt 1-3


It's the second one from 1.14 onwards that he mentions Orpington.

 

[Clio]

have you got a link to it

Hope this works

[video=youtube;nZe4Po7EuAc]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZe4Po7EuAc[/video]

 

[Amster]

I wonder why Tia didn't see her father for 2 years? Too bad she couldn't have gone to live with him and his partner. Tia had a brother, there, also.

 

[India99]

Hope this works

i'm amazed they missed this one, gonna download it before they find it and remove it lol

 

[kaos]

Hope this works

FULL INTERVIEW ITV News Stuart Hazell Exclusive (high quality).flv - YouTube

Watching the videos again, he's amazingly comfortable in front of the camera - even staring directly into it saying "Tia, come home babe, I want my £10 back for the garden" - along with a little giggle.

 

[Adorabella]

yeah he said something like " Orpington wasn't it ?"

then DS simply said "Ashburton"

My brain is fizzing with all the possibilities and what we know to be fact and what we don't, so much so that they are all rolling into one.

The above has made me question why would DS say Ashburton, if no visit was ever made to the fair (he could have just left it as Orpington and we'd be none the wiser) and as he did say it - if no visit was made, doesn't that involve him somehow?

 

[Adorabella]

Watching the videos again, he's amazingly comfortable in front of the camera - even staring directly into it saying "Tia, come home babe, I want my £10 back for the garden" - along with a little giggle.

He may have been primed by the TV producer on how to behave, where to look and to speak directly to TS as at that point she was presumed missing.

 

[kaos]

He may have been primed by the TV producer on how to behave, where to look and to speak directly to TS as at that point she was presumed missing.

Fair point. He shows a complete range of emotions too, right from welling up with tears when he's pleading for her to come home, right through to a giggle. He shows no fear, never shaking physically although he stumbles and mumbles through his recollections.

 

[India99]

My brain is fizzing with all the possibilities and what we know to be fact and what we don't, so much so that they are all rolling into one.

The above has made me question why would DS say Ashburton, if no visit was ever made to the fair (he could have just left it as Orpington and we'd be none the wiser) and as he did say it - if no visit was made, doesn't that involve him somehow?

that would depend, if CS and SH had said sometime friday that they had been there then he would just assume they had and corrected him.

but obviously DS isn't the sharpest tool in the box either or he would have picked up on it too but his facial expression didn't change at all.

 

[India99]

Fair point. He shows a complete range of emotions too, right from welling up with tears when he's pleading for her to come home, right through to a giggle. He shows no fear, never shaking physically although he stumbles and mumbles through his recollections.

when you have been making up a story in your head for nearly a week then the shakes would be gone as by that time you would have it so rehearsed that even you would believe your own lies.

 

[kaos]

when you have been making up a story in your head for nearly a week then the shakes would be gone as by that time you would have it so rehearsed that even you would believe your own lies.

It wasn't just the shaking from nerves I was thinking about. If he's as heavy a drinker as the shop video shows then I'd expect him to have some sign of the DT's. He was slurring and mumbling quite a bit at times in the video so I wonder if he'd also had alcohol (mixed with some red bull to cover the smell!).

 

[India99]

It wasn't just the shaking from nerves I was thinking about. If he's as heavy a drinker as the shop video shows then I'd expect him to have some sign of the DT's. He was slurring and mumbling quite a bit at times in the video so I wonder if he'd also had alcohol (mixed with some red bull to cover the smell!).

i would think that its almost guaranteed that he's had a drink

 

[accidental-zen]

The above has made me question why would DS say Ashburton, if no visit was ever made to the fair (he could have just left it as Orpington and we'd be none the wiser) and as he did say it - if no visit was made, doesn't that involve him somehow?

You know, Adorabella, I really hadn't thought of it that way, but you might be onto something there...

 

[graceholl]

Watching the videos again, he's amazingly comfortable in front of the camera - even staring directly into it saying "Tia, come home babe, I want my £10 back for the garden" - along with a little giggle.

uke:

 

[Clio]

that would depend, if CS and SH had said sometime friday that they had been there then he would just assume they had and corrected him.

but obviously DS isn't the sharpest tool in the box either or he would have picked up on it too but his facial expression didn't change at all.

If you put SH's involvement aside for a moment and think about who else might/might not be involved then *IF* the visit to the fair didn't happen then it's very relevant when the story emerged, both to the rest of the family and to the police wouldn't you say?

 

[India99]

If you put SH's involvement aside for a moment and think about who else might/might not be involved then *IF* the visit to the fair didn't happen then it's very relevant when the story emerged, both to the rest of the family and to the police wouldn't you say?

but if SH and CS didn't go to the fair but told people they did, then why wouldn't they believe them ?

 

[Clio]

but if SH and CS didn't go to the fair but told people they did, then why wouldn't they believe them ?

The key person here is CS. She had to know if they went or not