UT - Kouri Richins, 33, Author, wife, mom, charged in husband’s unexpected death last year, May 2023 #3

[Justice101]

Johnny Depp's ex Amber Heard also comes to mind.

She was also a pathological liar it seems.

 

[arielilane]

Tyler Robinson and Kouri Richins now share the same defense law firm. Kathy Nester has been appointed as Robinson's counsel.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[legalmomma]

Kouri Richins' defense attorney appointed to Tyler Robinson murder case

One of Kouri Richins' defense team will now be defending Tyler Robinson as well.The Utah County Commission unanimously approved the contract for Kathy Nester.Ne

kutv.com

Nester is being hired by the county as an outside defense attorney after the Utah Public Defenders office said they cannot take the case.

 

[angelainwi]

Lauren from Hidden True Crime. WHOA!

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ch_13]

Here's a story on the latest events.

Kouri Richins attorneys asking court to let her out of jail after bombshell revelation

Kouri Richins asked the court to let her out of jail after a bombshell in the case.The attorneys for Richins, the Kamas mom accused of murdering her husband wit

kutv.com

The attorneys for Richins, the Kamas mom accused of murdering her husband with fentanyl in 2022, filed a motion on Thursday to reconsider bail in the case after a key witness said he never sold fentanyl to the woman accused of being Richins' drug dealer.
...
Richins' attorneys said that despite this being exculpatory information, which could help prove Kouri’s innocence, and that they are required to turn it over to the defense, that did not happen.

 

[Megnut]

Here's a story on the latest events.

Kouri Richins attorneys asking court to let her out of jail after bombshell revelation

Kouri Richins asked the court to let her out of jail after a bombshell in the case.The attorneys for Richins, the Kamas mom accused of murdering her husband wit

kutv.com

The attorneys for Richins, the Kamas mom accused of murdering her husband with fentanyl in 2022, filed a motion on Thursday to reconsider bail in the case after a key witness said he never sold fentanyl to the woman accused of being Richins' drug dealer.
...
Richins' attorneys said that despite this being exculpatory information, which could help prove Kouri’s innocence, and that they are required to turn it over to the defense, that did not happen.

A drug dealer who lies? Why, I never...

Does it really matter from where the fentanyl came?

 

[Justice101]

What do you guys think about this?

Is this a show stopper or just a yawn?

 

[Megnut]

What do you guys think about this?

Is this a show stopper or just a yawn?

Yawn.

Desperate yawn.

JMO

 

[cujenn81]

Here's a story on the latest events.

Kouri Richins attorneys asking court to let her out of jail after bombshell revelation

Kouri Richins asked the court to let her out of jail after a bombshell in the case.The attorneys for Richins, the Kamas mom accused of murdering her husband wit

kutv.com

The attorneys for Richins, the Kamas mom accused of murdering her husband with fentanyl in 2022, filed a motion on Thursday to reconsider bail in the case after a key witness said he never sold fentanyl to the woman accused of being Richins' drug dealer.
...
Richins' attorneys said that despite this being exculpatory information, which could help prove Kouri’s innocence, and that they are required to turn it over to the defense, that did not happen.

It means diddly squat to me that the witness only remembers selling KR’s dealer oxycontin because the overwhelming majority of prescription pain pills sold on the street contain fentanyl anyway.

 

[SteveS]

What do you guys think about this?

Is this a show stopper or just a yawn?

IMO it is a mixed bag.

It's not a yawner to ignore. There are a lot of "if's" that are not proven to be true in this allegation, but at this point they are not proven to be false, either.

The biggie is the claim that the state has hidden exculpatory evidence (evidence that would seem to point to innocence). That's a major no-no, and on its face, this sure appears to be exculpatory in every way. There's no question that a key witness changing his story is something that the defense is entitled to know, and use to support their case, and it also calls into question whether the state can prove she bought fentanyl (which is what killed him). Obviously every piece of evidence has to be weighed and argued and the jury decides what to make of it, but this has relevance (the key issue).

However, "I only sold oxy" is not a fact, it's just a claim by a witness. It could be a lie. And it's only one piece of evidence -- it's not the entire case. We also have to keep in mind that the dealer has a major incentive to walk back his testimony, because if HIS fentanyl killed Eric, his neck is in the noose too. In many states, it's a murder charge to be the supplier of the illegal drug that kills, no matter how it happened to be ingested.

As to whether the existence of this evidence is a show-stopper, nah it's not that either. This evidence doesn't by itself prove anything, including that she didn't do it. She (by her own admission) was the only one there when he died, her story of that night is full of holes, it accidentally points the finger at herself as the only one who could have done it, and he was definitely killed by someone poisoning him with fentanyl (whether this dealer supplied it or not).

BUT this is relevant, and there may be an investigation, and if found to be deliberate that they buried it and tried to keep the defense from finding it (which seems possible), the DA and staff may get slapped in some way. But imo, not the victims. The DA-etc can say they didn't believe his new testimony, and they are probably right to think that way, BUT that's not a legit excuse. They turn over all evidence that's relevant, so that the defense can present at trial what they think is useful to them, and it's up to the jury to weigh it all and decide.

I don't think the judge lets a murderer out on the streets, however, by the emergence of some evidence that may help the defense argue their case. That is too extreme. And this is far from proof of innocence.